Alang Sirry M, Letcher Abby S, Mitsdarffer Mary Louise, Kieber-Emmons Autumn, Rivera Jose, Moeller Carol, Biery Nyann, Batts Hasshan
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2025 May;26(3):496-506. doi: 10.1177/15248399231223744. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
People experiencing addiction, houselessness, or who have a history of incarceration have worse health outcomes compared with the general population. This is due, in part, to practices and policies of historically White institutions that exclude the voices, perspectives, and contributions of communities of color in leadership, socio-economic development, and decision-making that matters for their wellbeing. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches hold promise for addressing health inequities. However, full engagement of people harmed by systemic injustices in CBPR partnerships is challenging due to inequities in power and access to resources. We describe how an Allentown-based CBPR partnership-the Health Equity Activation Research Team of clinicians, researchers, and persons with histories of incarceration, addiction, and houselessness-uses the Radical Welcome Engagement Restoration Model (RWERM) to facilitate full engagement by all partners. Data were collected through participatory ethnography, focus groups, and individual interviews. Analyses were performed using deductive coding in a series of iterative meaning-making processes that involved all partners. Findings highlighted six defining phases of the radical welcome framework: (a) passionate invitation, (b) radical welcome, (c) authentic sense of belonging, (d) co-creation of roles, (e) prioritization of issues, and (f) individual and collective action. A guide to assessing progression across these phases, as well as a 32-item radical welcome instrument to help CBPR partners anticipate and overcome challenges to engagement are introduced and discussed.
与普通人群相比,有药物成瘾、无家可归或有监禁史的人健康状况更差。部分原因在于,历史上白人主导的机构的做法和政策在领导力、社会经济发展以及对他们的福祉至关重要的决策中,排除了有色人种社区的声音、观点和贡献。基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)方法有望解决健康不平等问题。然而,由于权力和资源获取方面的不平等,在CBPR合作关系中,那些受到系统性不公正伤害的人充分参与具有挑战性。我们描述了一个位于阿伦敦的CBPR合作关系——由临床医生、研究人员以及有监禁、成瘾和无家可归史的人组成的健康公平激活研究团队——如何使用激进欢迎参与恢复模型(RWERM)来促进所有合作伙伴的充分参与。数据通过参与性人种志、焦点小组和个人访谈收集。在一系列涉及所有合作伙伴的迭代意义构建过程中,使用演绎编码进行分析。研究结果突出了激进欢迎框架的六个定义阶段:(a)热情邀请,(b)激进欢迎,(c)真正的归属感,(d)角色的共同创造,(e)问题的优先排序,以及(f)个人和集体行动。介绍并讨论了评估这些阶段进展的指南,以及一个32项的激进欢迎工具,以帮助CBPR合作伙伴预测并克服参与方面的挑战。