Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
FEHRA, Arrhythmia Unit, University Hospital Careggi, EP Lab, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Europace. 2024 Feb 1;26(2). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae037.
Simulator training has been recently introduced in electrophysiology (EP) programmes in order to improve catheter manipulation skills without complication risks. The aim of this study is to survey the current use of EP simulators and the perceived need for these tools in clinical training and practice.
A 20-item online questionnaire developed by the Scientific Initiatives Committee of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) in collaboration with EHRA Digital Committee was disseminated through the EHRA Scientific Research Network members, national EP groups, and social media platforms. Seventy-four respondents from 22 countries (73% males; 50% under 40 years old) completed the survey. Despite being perceived as useful among EP professionals (81%), EP simulators are rarely a part of the institutional cardiology training programme (20%) and only 18% of the respondents have an EP simulator at their institution. When available, simulators are mainly used in EP to train transseptal puncture, ablation, and mapping, followed by device implantation (cardiac resynchronization therapy [CRT], leadless, and conduction system pacing [CSP]). Almost all respondents (96%) believe that simulator programmes should be a part of the routine institutional EP training, hopefully developed by EHRA, in order to improve the efficacy and safety of EP procedures and in particular CSP 58%, CRT 42%, leadless pacing 38%, or complex arrhythmia ablations (VT 58%, PVI 45%, and PVC 42%).
This current EHRA survey identified a perceived need but a lack of institutional simulator programme access for electrophysiologists who could benefit from it in order to speed up the learning curve process and reduce complications of complex EP procedures.
为了提高导管操作技能,同时避免并发症风险,电生理(EP)项目最近引入了模拟器培训。本研究旨在调查 EP 模拟器的当前使用情况以及在临床培训和实践中对这些工具的需求。
由欧洲心律协会(EHRA)科学倡议委员会与 EHRA 数字委员会合作开发的 20 项在线问卷通过 EHRA 科学研究网络成员、国家 EP 小组和社交媒体平台进行了分发。来自 22 个国家的 74 名受访者(73%为男性;50%年龄在 40 岁以下)完成了调查。尽管 EP 专业人员认为模拟器很有用(81%),但模拟器很少成为机构心脏病学培训计划的一部分(20%),只有 18%的受访者所在机构有 EP 模拟器。模拟器在 EP 中主要用于经间隔穿刺、消融和标测培训,其次是设备植入(心脏再同步治疗 [CRT]、无导线和传导系统起搏 [CSP])。几乎所有受访者(96%)认为模拟器计划应该成为机构 EP 培训常规的一部分,希望由 EHRA 开发,以提高 EP 程序的效果和安全性,特别是 CSP(58%)、CRT(42%)、无导线起搏(38%)或复杂心律失常消融(VT(58%)、PVI(45%)和 PVC(42%))。
这项当前的 EHRA 调查确定了电生理学家对模拟器程序的需求,但缺乏机构访问权限,他们可以从中受益,以加快学习曲线过程并降低复杂 EP 程序的并发症风险。