• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青少年执行功能评估工具:系统评价更新。

Evaluation instruments for executive functions in children and adolescents: an update of a systematic review.

机构信息

School of Occupational Therapy, Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Apr;24(4):487-508. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2311872. Epub 2024 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1080/14737167.2024.2311872
PMID:38294492
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to update a systematic review of instruments for evaluating the executive functions (EFs) in a pediatric population to assess their measurement properties.

AREA COVERED

Studies describing evaluation tools of EFs were systematically searched on four electronic databases: PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus, and Web of Science. To be included studies had to be on a population aged 0 to 18 were included. The individuals were either healthy or presented a neurodevelopment disorder. Risk of Bias was evaluated through the Consensus-based Standards to select the health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).

EXPERT OPINION

The search was conducted on April 2023. Eighty-four papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study; the studies refer to 72 different evaluation tools of EFs. Most of the studies analyzed through a methodological quality analysis received an 'adequate' score. The instrument most mentioned was the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-2 (BRIEF2) in seven articles.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在更新针对儿童人群执行功能(EF)评估工具的系统评价,以评估其测量特性。

涵盖领域

我们在四个电子数据库(PubMed、EBSCO、Scopus 和 Web of Science)上系统地搜索了描述 EF 评估工具的研究。纳入的研究必须针对年龄在 0 至 18 岁的人群,且这些人群健康或患有神经发育障碍。通过基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)评估偏倚风险。

专家意见

检索于 2023 年 4 月进行。有 84 篇论文符合纳入标准,并被纳入研究;这些研究涉及 72 种不同的 EF 评估工具。通过方法学质量分析进行分析的大多数研究获得了“适当”评分。在七篇文章中,最常提到的工具是行为评定量表-执行功能 2 版(BRIEF2)。

相似文献

1
Evaluation instruments for executive functions in children and adolescents: an update of a systematic review.儿童和青少年执行功能评估工具:系统评价更新。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Apr;24(4):487-508. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2311872. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
2
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.
3
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
4
A Systematic Review of the Validity and Reliability of Assessment Tools for Executive Function and Adaptive Function Following Brain Pathology among Children and Adolescents in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.一项针对中低收入国家儿童和青少年脑病理后执行功能和适应功能评估工具的效度和信度的系统评价。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2022 Dec;32(4):974-1016. doi: 10.1007/s11065-022-09538-3. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
5
Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review.根据基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准评估移动健康应用程序的内容、疗效和可用性的工具:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 1;9(12):e15433. doi: 10.2196/15433.
6
The effectiveness of interventions to treat severe acute malnutrition in young children: a systematic review.干预措施治疗幼儿严重急性营养不良的效果:系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(19):1-316. doi: 10.3310/hta16190.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
8
Family-centred care for hospitalised children aged 0-12 years.以家庭为中心的0至12岁住院儿童护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD004811. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004811.pub3.
9
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
10
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.以学校为基础的体育活动项目,旨在促进6至18岁儿童和青少年的体育活动及健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Assessment Tools for Aphasia: A Systematic Review.失语症评估工具的质量:一项系统综述。
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):271. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030271.