Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Private Dental Practice, Oberndorferstraße 39, 6322, Kirchbichl, Austria.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jan 31;28(2):128. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05522-8.
This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the wear of natural teeth opposing 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (3Y-TZP) with different surface conditions.
Sixty 3Y-TZP specimens were randomly assigned to six groups (n = 10), differing in surface condition. In three groups, the samples underwent glazing-with the glaze applied to roughened (i.e., 106-µm-grit diamond-finished), as-sintered, and polished zirconia. The three remaining groups consisted of unglazed specimens: solely polished samples and diamond-finished samples (106-µm-grit and 46-µm-grit) without further conditioning. Two-body wear was evaluated at extracted, non-carious molars (n = 60), which served as antagonists in chewing simulation (10,000 masticatory cycles, 49N load). As a control, natural teeth with intact enamel surfaces were tested against natural molars (n = 10). All samples were 3D-scanned before and after the chewing simulation (7 Series, Straumann). Volume loss was calculated (Inspect Software, GOM), and statistically analyzed (SPSS Statistics 24, IBM).
Volume loss of the natural antagonists decreased in the following order: 106-µm-grit diamond-finished zirconia (4.6 ± 2.5 mm), glazed 106-µm-grit diamond-finished zirconia (3.8 ± 1.1 mm), glazed as-sintered zirconia (3.5 ± 0.9 mm), 46-µm-grit diamond-finished zirconia (1.7 ± 0.6 mm), control (1.6 ± 0.7 mm), glazed polished zirconia (1.4 ± 0.5 mm), and solely polishing (0.4 ± 0.2 mm). Even when polishing the surfaces before glazing, volume loss was not mitigated to the same extent as after polishing alone.
The zirconia surface condition beneath the glazing influences antagonist wear. Although polishing before glazing resulted in acceptable levels of antagonist wear, this approach did not yield as favorable results as polishing alone.
For operators favoring glazing, pre-polishing the zirconia surface could be advantageous to reduce wear.
本体外研究旨在评估不同表面条件下天然牙与 3 摩尔%氧化钇稳定四方氧化锆多晶(3Y-TZP)之间的磨损。
将 60 个 3Y-TZP 样本随机分为 6 组(n=10),每组样本的表面条件不同。其中 3 组样本经过上釉处理,釉料涂覆在粗化(即 106-µm 粒度金刚石研磨)、烧结和抛光的氧化锆表面上。其余 3 组为未上釉样本:仅抛光样本和未经进一步处理的金刚石研磨样本(106-µm 粒度和 46-µm 粒度)。在咀嚼模拟实验(10000 次咀嚼循环,49N 负载)中,使用提取的无龋磨牙(n=60)作为对颌,评估双体磨损。作为对照,用天然牙完整的牙釉质表面与天然磨牙(n=10)进行测试。在咀嚼模拟实验前后,所有样本均使用 3D 扫描仪进行扫描(7 系列,Straumann)。使用 Inspect 软件(GOM)计算体积损失,并使用 SPSS Statistics 24(IBM)进行统计分析。
天然对颌牙的体积损失依次降低:106-µm 粒度金刚石研磨氧化锆(4.6±2.5mm)、106-µm 粒度上釉金刚石研磨氧化锆(3.8±1.1mm)、烧结后上釉氧化锆(3.5±0.9mm)、46-µm 粒度金刚石研磨氧化锆(1.7±0.6mm)、对照组(1.6±0.7mm)、上釉抛光氧化锆(1.4±0.5mm)和仅抛光(0.4±0.2mm)。即使在上釉前对表面进行抛光,也无法将体积损失降低到与单独抛光相同的程度。
上釉下的氧化锆表面状况会影响对颌牙的磨损。虽然在上釉前进行抛光可以降低对颌牙的磨损程度,但这种方法的效果不如单独抛光。
对于喜欢上釉的操作人员来说,对上釉前的氧化锆表面进行预抛光可能有助于减少磨损。