• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

得体对于儿童和青少年重要吗?来自对儿童和青少年及其父母的深入访谈的证据。

Is well-becoming important for children and young people? Evidence from in-depth interviews with children and young people and their parents.

机构信息

Health Economics Bristol, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK.

Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2024 Apr;33(4):1051-1061. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03585-w. Epub 2024 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-023-03585-w
PMID:38294665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10973085/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study explores how important well-becoming factors appear to be to children during childhood. We define well-becoming as the indicators which predict children and young people's future wellbeing and opportunities. The priority for this work was to explore whether well-becoming might be an important factor to include in outcome measures for children and young people. The inclusion of well-becoming indicators could ensure that opportunities to invest in promoting wellbeing in children's futures are not missed.

METHODS

In-depth, qualitative interviews (N = 70) were undertaken with children and young people aged 6-15 years and their parents. Analysis used constant comparison and framework methods to investigate whether well-becoming factors were considered important by informants to children and young people's current wellbeing.

RESULTS

The findings of the interviews suggested that children and young people and their parents are concerned with future well-becoming now, as factors such as future achievement, financial security, health, independence, identity, and relationships were identified as key to future quality of life. Informants suggested that they considered it important during childhood to aspire towards positive outcomes in children and young people's futures.

CONCLUSION

The study findings, taken alongside relevant literature, have generated evidence to support the notion that future well-becoming is important to current wellbeing. We have drawn on our own work in capability wellbeing measure development to demonstrate how we have incorporated a well-becoming attribute into our measures. The inclusion of well-becoming indicators in measures could aid investment in interventions which more directly improve well-becoming outcomes for children and young people.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨在儿童时期,良好成长因素对儿童的重要性。我们将良好成长定义为预测儿童和青少年未来幸福和机会的指标。这项工作的重点是探讨良好成长是否可能成为儿童和青少年成果衡量标准中一个重要的因素。纳入良好成长指标可以确保不忽视为儿童未来促进幸福感而投资的机会。

方法

对 6-15 岁的儿童和青少年及其父母进行了深入的定性访谈(N=70)。分析采用了恒定比较和框架方法,以调查信息提供者是否认为良好成长因素对儿童和青少年的当前幸福感很重要。

结果

访谈结果表明,儿童和青少年及其父母现在就关注未来的良好成长,因为未来的成就、经济安全、健康、独立、身份和人际关系等因素被认为是未来生活质量的关键。信息提供者表示,他们认为在儿童时期,让孩子对未来有积极的期望很重要。

结论

研究结果与相关文献一起,为未来良好成长对当前幸福感很重要的观点提供了证据。我们借鉴了自己在能力幸福感衡量标准发展方面的工作,展示了我们如何将良好成长属性纳入我们的衡量标准中。在衡量标准中纳入良好成长指标可以促进对干预措施的投资,这些干预措施可以更直接地改善儿童和青少年的良好成长结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8dd/10973085/5dc55c25b251/11136_2023_3585_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8dd/10973085/5dc55c25b251/11136_2023_3585_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8dd/10973085/5dc55c25b251/11136_2023_3585_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Is well-becoming important for children and young people? Evidence from in-depth interviews with children and young people and their parents.得体对于儿童和青少年重要吗?来自对儿童和青少年及其父母的深入访谈的证据。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Apr;33(4):1051-1061. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03585-w. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
2
The development of a capability wellbeing measure in economic evaluation for children and young people aged 11-15.儿童和青少年(11-15 岁)经济评估中能力福利衡量标准的制定。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Nov;360:117311. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117311. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
3
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
4
Systematic review of tools to measure outcomes for young children with autism spectrum disorder.对测量自闭症谱系障碍幼儿结局的工具进行系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jun;19(41):1-506. doi: 10.3310/hta19410.
5
Parent-delivered interventions used at home to improve eating, drinking and swallowing in children with neurodisability: the FEEDS mixed-methods study.家长在家中实施的干预措施,以改善神经发育障碍儿童的进食、饮水和吞咽能力:FEEDS 混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(22):1-208. doi: 10.3310/hta25220.
6
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Qualitative evidence synthesis informing our understanding of people's perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication.定性证据综合分析有助于我们理解人们对定向数字通信的认知和体验。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 23;10(10):ED000141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000141.
9
Powered mobility interventions for very young children with mobility limitations to aid participation and positive development: the EMPoWER evidence synthesis.助力行动能力受限的非常年幼儿童参与和积极发展的电动移动干预措施:EMPOWER 证据综合研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Oct;24(50):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta24500.
10
Service design for children and young people with common mental health problems: literature review, service mapping and collective case study.儿童和青少年常见心理健康问题的服务设计:文献综述、服务映射和集体案例研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 May;12(13):1-181. doi: 10.3310/DKRT6293.

引用本文的文献

1
The development of a capability wellbeing measure in economic evaluation for children and young people aged 11-15.儿童和青少年(11-15 岁)经济评估中能力福利衡量标准的制定。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Nov;360:117311. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117311. Epub 2024 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Well-being and well-becoming through the life-course in public health economics research and policy: A new infographic.通过公共卫生经济学研究和政策实现生命历程中的健康与幸福:一个新的信息图。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;10:1035260. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035260. eCollection 2022.
2
Methodological challenges surrounding QALY estimation for paediatric economic evaluation.儿科经济评估中围绕质量调整生命年(QALY)估计的方法学挑战。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Mar 3;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00345-4.
3
Conducting Qualitative Research Online: Challenges and Solutions.
在线进行定性研究:挑战与解决方案。
Patient. 2021 Nov;14(6):711-718. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00528-w. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
4
Challenges in developing capability measures for children and young people for use in the economic evaluation of health and care interventions.发展儿童和青少年能力测量工具在卫生和保健干预经济评价中的挑战。
Health Econ. 2021 Sep;30(9):1990-2003. doi: 10.1002/hec.4363. Epub 2021 May 25.
5
A Systematic Review of the Use and Quality of Qualitative Methods in Concept Elicitation for Measures with Children and Young People.系统评价定性方法在儿童和青少年测量概念提取中的使用和质量。
Patient. 2020 Jun;13(3):257-288. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00414-x.
6
Capability instruments in economic evaluations of health-related interventions: a comparative review of the literature.健康相关干预措施经济评价中的能力量表:文献的比较综述。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jun;29(6):1433-1464. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02393-5. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
7
Social prescribing.社会处方
BMJ. 2019 Mar 28;364:l1285. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1285.
8
A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations.儿科通用多属性效用工具的开发与应用综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Oct;33(10):1013-28. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0286-7.
9
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.运用多学科健康研究中定性数据分析的框架方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
10
Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: report of the ISPOR PRO good research practices for the assessment of children and adolescents task force.支持医疗产品标签的研究用儿科患者报告结局测评工具:ISPOR PRO 评估儿童和青少年实践良好研究报告工具专题组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):461-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.004.