Suppr超能文献

不同左甲状腺素给药方案对甲状腺激素水平的影响:系统评价、成对比较和网络荟萃分析。

The effect of different levothyroxine administration regimens on thyroid hormone levels: a systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Postgraduate Program in Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Mar;17(3):275-291. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2024.2313616. Epub 2024 Feb 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review aimed to compare the effect of alternative levothyroxine administration regimens on thyroid hormone levels and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among adults with hypothyroidism.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, LILACS, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, OpenGrey, ProQuest, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP from inception to May/2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We assessed the risk of bias with Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. We analyzed TSH levels by pairwise and network meta-analyses (NMA). The FT4 levels and PROs were qualitatively assessed.

RESULTS

We included 14 RCTs (906 participants) comparing different regimens, as bedtime vs. before breakfast. A total of 12 RCTs were at high risk of bias. Seven RCTs were included in the TSH meta-analysis, where the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were as follows: bedtime vs before breakfast (4 RCTs) 0.69 (-1.67-3.04), I = 92%, very low certainty evidence; weekly dose vs before breakfast (2 RCTs) 1.68 (0.94-2.41), I = 0%, low certainty evidence; and at breakfast vs before breakfast (1 RCT) 0.65 (-1.11-2.41), very low certainty evidence. The NMA showed no evidence of differences in TSH level with different regimens.

CONCLUSION

The evidence is insufficient to determine the most effective levothyroxine administration regimen for hypothyroidism.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO - CRD42021279375.

摘要

简介

本系统评价旨在比较替代左甲状腺素给药方案对甲状腺功能减退症成年患者甲状腺激素水平和患者报告结局(PRO)的影响。

方法

我们从建库至 2023 年 5 月在 PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL、CINAHL、LILACS、SciELO、Scopus、Web of Science、OpenGrey、ProQuest、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 ICTRP 中搜索了随机对照试验(RCT)。我们使用 Cochrane 风险偏倚工具 2.0 评估了风险偏倚。我们通过两两和网络荟萃分析(NMA)分析了 TSH 水平。FT4 水平和 PRO 进行了定性评估。

结果

我们纳入了 14 项比较不同方案(如睡前 vs. 早餐前)的 RCT(906 名参与者)。共有 12 项 RCT 存在高偏倚风险。7 项 RCT 纳入了 TSH 荟萃分析,其中均值差(MD)和 95%置信区间(CI)如下:睡前 vs. 早餐前(4 项 RCT)0.69(-1.67-3.04),I²=92%,极低确定性证据;每周剂量 vs. 早餐前(2 项 RCT)1.68(0.94-2.41),I²=0%,低确定性证据;早餐时 vs. 早餐前(1 项 RCT)0.65(-1.11-2.41),极低确定性证据。NMA 未显示不同方案的 TSH 水平存在差异的证据。

结论

证据不足以确定治疗甲状腺功能减退症的最有效左甲状腺素给药方案。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO - CRD42021279375。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验