Arthroscopy. 2024 Feb;40(2):478-480. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.09.018.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) represents a biological treatment for various musculoskeletal conditions. Over the past 20 years, publications regarding the treatment of orthopaedic conditions with PRP have shown a 4-fold increase. Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have demonstrated that PRP is effective and often superior to other treatment modalities. However, the value of these studies is somehow limited as high risk of bias, study heterogeneity, and low levels of certainty compromise the validity of their conclusions. In this scenario, expert consensus studies can be useful and allow pooling of expert opinion in a scientific manner. Using the modified Delphi technology, it was determined that the definition of PRP, whether leukocyte rich or poor, is still not clear. In addition, it remains unclear whether PRP should be activated, how often it should be injected, what the ideal dose is and how to prepare PRP. Despite these uncertainties, the use PRP for various orthopaedic conditions, in particular for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, is supported by a large number of clinical studies. However, its use remains an unsolved controversy, and the foundation of a biologics association is a step in the right direction to develop standards and foster research with regards to the safety, clinical efficacy, and clinical applications of orthobiologics. In summary, there is no strong consensus, but many individual statements result in a strong consensus rating.
富血小板血浆(PRP)是一种治疗各种肌肉骨骼疾病的生物疗法。在过去的 20 年中,关于 PRP 治疗骨科疾病的出版物增加了 4 倍。几项系统评价和荟萃分析表明,PRP 是有效且通常优于其他治疗方法。然而,这些研究的价值在某种程度上受到限制,因为高风险的偏见、研究异质性和低水平的确定性影响了其结论的有效性。在这种情况下,专家共识研究可能很有用,并允许以科学的方式汇集专家意见。使用改良 Delphi 技术,确定 PRP 的定义(白细胞丰富或缺乏)仍然不清楚。此外,PRP 是否应该激活、应多久注射一次、理想剂量是多少以及如何制备 PRP 仍不清楚。尽管存在这些不确定性,但 PRP 已被广泛应用于各种骨科疾病,特别是膝骨关节炎的治疗。然而,其使用仍然存在争议,生物制剂协会的成立是朝着制定标准和促进生物制剂的安全性、临床疗效和临床应用研究迈出的正确方向。总之,虽然没有达成强烈共识,但许多单独的声明导致了强烈的共识评级。