University Laboratory of Materials Research, Medical University of Lodz.
Department of Biomaterials Science and Turku Clinical Biomaterials Center-TCBC, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku.
Dent Mater J. 2024 Mar 29;43(2):155-163. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2023-192. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
The aim of this study was to compare two testing methodologies employed for assessing the polymerization shrinkage stress of dental resin composites. Ten commercial resin composites were investigated (EverX Posterior & Flow; G-ænial Anterior, Posterior, A'CHORD & Universal Injectable; Filtek One Bulk Fill & Universal Restorative; SDR flow+ and Aura Bulk Fill). Photoelastic and contraction forces measurement methods were performed. The slope of the linear trendline and C-factor of specimens were calculated. The shrinkage stress values (range between: 6.4-13.4 MPa) obtained by the photoelastic method were higher for all resin composites than the values obtained by contraction forces measurements (range between 1.2-4.8 MPa). However, there was a strong linear correlation between these methods (r=0.8). The use of both investigated methods revealed important information about the shrinkage behavior of the restorative resin composites.
本研究旨在比较两种用于评估牙科树脂复合材料聚合收缩应力的测试方法。研究考察了十种商业树脂复合材料(EverX Posterior & Flow;G-ænial Anterior、Posterior、A'CHORD & Universal Injectable;Filtek One Bulk Fill & Universal Restorative;SDR flow+和 Aura Bulk Fill)。分别采用光弹法和收缩力测量法进行测试。计算了试件线性趋势线斜率和 C 因子。光弹法测得的收缩应力值(范围为 6.4-13.4 MPa)均高于收缩力测量法(范围为 1.2-4.8 MPa)的收缩应力值。然而,这两种方法之间存在很强的线性相关性(r=0.8)。两种方法的使用均揭示了有关修复树脂复合材料收缩行为的重要信息。