Scheper-Hughes N
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1987 Mar;11(1):53-78. doi: 10.1007/BF00055009.
The deinstitutionalization of psychiatric patients is a deeply cultural as well as political task. It entails the sharing of responsibility for human distress with family and community. Consequently, the locus of social control has also shifted from psychiatric and medical expertise to community and legal institutions. Diagnosis and treatment models must be more compatible with lay explanatory models. This paper explores the various meanings of "going 'mental"' and "being 'mental"' in the white, working class, ethnic neighborhood of South Boston. The data are extracted from a study of the impact of deinstitutionalization on a cohort of middle-aged, psychiatric patients discharged from Boston State Hospital in the attempt to return them to community living. Individual, family, and community responses to, and interpretations of, the symptoms of mental distress are discussed. The study indicates that even seriously disturbed individuals are sensitive to cultural meanings and social cues regarding the perception, expression, and content of psychiatric episodes. While madness invariably disenfranchises, it does not necessarily deculturate the individual.
精神科患者的非机构化是一项深刻的文化和政治任务。它需要家庭和社区分担应对人类痛苦的责任。因此,社会控制的场所也从精神病学和医学专业知识转向了社区和法律机构。诊断和治疗模式必须与外行的解释模式更加兼容。本文探讨了在南波士顿白人、工人阶级、种族聚居区中“发疯”和“精神错乱”的各种含义。数据取自一项关于非机构化对一群从中年时从波士顿州立医院出院、试图回归社区生活的精神病患者的影响的研究。文中讨论了个人、家庭和社区对精神痛苦症状的反应及解读。该研究表明,即使是严重精神错乱的个体,对于有关精神疾病发作的感知、表达和内容的文化意义及社会线索也很敏感。虽然疯狂总是使个体丧失权利,但不一定会使其丧失文化特征。