Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2024 May;34(5):396-404. doi: 10.1111/pan.14846. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
To systematically identify and synthesize the available evidence of the neurological airway respiratory cardiovascular other-surgical severity (NARCO-SS) score as compared to other pediatric specific perioperative scoring systems.
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. All studies in all languages comparing NARCO-SS with pediatric perioperative scoring systems against outcomes were included. Records were screened and data were extracted by three independent reviewers into standardized pilot-tested extraction templates.
Electronic searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL (from inception to February 2023).
The references were uploaded to a validated software for systematic reviews (Rayyan) and screened against the inclusion criteria. Full text of included studies were reviewed and the available data were tabulated. We conducted Risk of Bias analysis on the included studies using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).
A meta-analysis could not be performed due to differences in outcome definitions across the included studies. Correlations between NARCO-SS scores, ASA-PS scores and the predefined outcomes of each study were presented as a narrative synthesis. The included studies were determined to have a high risk of bias using the PROBAST.
This review has identified a need for high-quality studies assessing NARCO-SS before recommendations for clinical practice can be made. Addressing its limitations and enhancing the NARCO-SS through targeted refinements of its individual descriptive categories could potentially lead to improvement in its overall predictive accuracy and facilitate wider adoption into clinical practice.
系统地识别和综合现有的关于神经气道呼吸心血管其他手术严重程度(NARCO-SS)评分的证据,与其他儿科围手术期评分系统进行比较。
本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行。纳入了所有比较 NARCO-SS 与儿科围手术期评分系统的研究,这些研究均针对结局进行了评估。记录由三名独立审查员进行筛选,并将数据提取到标准化的试点提取模板中。
在 MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus 和 CINAHL(从创建到 2023 年 2 月)中进行了电子检索。
将参考文献上传至经过验证的系统评价软件(Rayyan),并根据纳入标准进行筛选。对纳入研究的全文进行了审查,并将可用数据制成表格。我们使用预测模型风险偏倚评估工具(PROBAST)对纳入研究进行了风险偏倚分析。
由于纳入研究的结局定义存在差异,因此无法进行荟萃分析。呈现了 NARCO-SS 评分、ASA-PS 评分与每项研究的预设结局之间的相关性,作为叙述性综合。使用 PROBAST 确定纳入研究存在高风险偏倚。
本综述表明,在提出临床实践建议之前,需要开展评估 NARCO-SS 的高质量研究。通过有针对性地改进其各个描述性类别,可以提高其整体预测准确性,并促进其更广泛地应用于临床实践。