• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在复发型多发性硬化症女性患者中,与特立氟胺相比,ponesimod 的疗效和安全性:来自关键性 OPTIMUM 研究的结果。

Efficacy and Safety of Ponesimod Compared with Teriflunomide in Female Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Findings from the Pivotal OPTIMUM Study.

机构信息

Office of Chief Medical Officer, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

Department of Statistics and Decision Sciences, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Apr;33(4):480-490. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0037. Epub 2024 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2023.0037
PMID:38301149
Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is threefold more prevalent in women than men. However, sex-specific efficacy analysis for MS disease-modifying therapies is not typically performed. analyses of data from female patients enrolled in the phase 3, double-blind OPTIMUM study of relapsing MS were carried out. Eligible adults were randomized to ponesimod 20 mg or teriflunomide 14 mg once daily for up to 108 weeks. The primary endpoint was annualized relapse rate (ARR); secondary endpoints included change in symptom domain of Fatigue Symptom and Impact Questionnaire-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (FSIQ-RMS) at week 108, number of combined unique active lesions (CUALs) per year on magnetic resonance imaging, and time to 12- and 24-week confirmed disability accumulation (CDA). A total of 735 female patients (581 of childbearing potential) were randomized to ponesimod ( = 363, 49.4%) or teriflunomide ( = 372, 50.6%). Relative risk reduction in the ARR for ponesimod versus teriflunomide was 33.1% (mean, 0.192 vs. 0.286, respectively;  < 0.002). Mean difference in FSIQ-RMS for ponesimod versus teriflunomide was -4.34 (0.12 vs. 4.46;  = 0.002); rate ratio in CUALs per year, 0.601 (1.45 vs. 2.41;  < 0.0001), and hazard ratio for time to 12- and 24-week CDA risk estimates, 0.83 (10.7% vs. 12.9%;  = 0.38) and 0.91 (8.8% vs. 9.7%;  = 0.69), respectively. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between treatment groups (89.0% and 90.1%). Analyses demonstrate the efficacy and safety of ponesimod, versus active comparator, for women with relapsing MS, supporting data-informed decision-making for women with MS. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02425644.

摘要

多发性硬化症(MS)在女性中的患病率是男性的三倍。然而,通常不会针对 MS 疾病修正治疗进行特定于性别的疗效分析。对纳入 3 期、双盲 OPTIMUM 复发型 MS 研究的女性患者进行数据分析。符合条件的成年人被随机分配接受 poniesimod 20mg 或特立氟胺 14mg 每日一次,最长 108 周。主要终点是年化复发率(ARR);次要终点包括第 108 周疲劳症状和影响问卷-复发型多发性硬化症(FSIQ-RMS)症状域的变化、每年联合独特活跃病变(CUALs)的数量以及 12 周和 24 周时确认残疾进展(CDA)的时间。共有 735 名女性患者(581 名有生育潜力)被随机分配至 poniesimod(n=363,49.4%)或 teriflunomide(n=372,50.6%)。poniesimod 与 teriflunomide 相比,ARR 的相对风险降低了 33.1%(平均值分别为 0.192 和 0.286; < 0.002)。poniesimod 与 teriflunomide 相比,FSIQ-RMS 的平均差异为-4.34(0.12 对 4.46; = 0.002);每年 CUALs 的比率为 0.601(1.45 对 2.41; < 0.0001),12 周和 24 周 CDA 风险估计的风险比分别为 0.83(10.7%对 12.9%; = 0.38)和 0.91(8.8%对 9.7%; = 0.69)。治疗出现的不良事件发生率在治疗组之间相似(89.0%和 90.1%)。分析表明,poniesimod 对复发型 MS 女性的疗效和安全性不劣于活性对照药物,为 MS 女性提供了基于数据的决策支持。临床试验注册号:NCT02425644。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Ponesimod Compared with Teriflunomide in Female Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Findings from the Pivotal OPTIMUM Study.在复发型多发性硬化症女性患者中,与特立氟胺相比,ponesimod 的疗效和安全性:来自关键性 OPTIMUM 研究的结果。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Apr;33(4):480-490. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0037. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
2
Teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis.特立氟胺用于治疗多发性硬化症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 22;3(3):CD009882. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009882.pub3.
3
Ponesimod Compared With Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in the Active-Comparator Phase 3 OPTIMUM Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.在主动对照 3 期 OPTIMUM 研究中,与特立氟胺相比,ponesimod 治疗活跃期多发性硬化症的患者:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 May 1;78(5):558-567. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0405.
4
Teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis.特立氟胺用于治疗多发性硬化症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD009882. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009882.pub2.
5
Treatment with disease-modifying drugs for people with a first clinical attack suggestive of multiple sclerosis.对首次出现提示多发性硬化症临床发作的患者使用疾病修饰药物进行治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 25;4(4):CD012200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012200.pub2.
6
Ponesimod as add-on treatment in patients with active relapsing multiple sclerosis under dimethyl fumarate (POINT): A phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.在接受富马酸二甲酯治疗的复发型多发性硬化症患者中,泊那司莫作为附加治疗(POINT):一项3期随机安慰剂对照临床试验。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2025 Jul 13;102:106616. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2025.106616.
7
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.免疫调节剂和免疫抑制剂治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的网状 Meta 分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 4;1(1):CD011381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011381.pub3.
8
Meta-analysis of adverse events in recent randomized clinical trials for dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer acetate and teriflunomide for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.近期富马酸二甲酯、醋酸格拉替雷和特立氟胺治疗复发型多发性硬化症随机临床试验中不良事件的荟萃分析。
Int J Neurosci. 2015;125(11):798-807. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2014.979982. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
9
Efficacy and safety of BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) and other disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison.BG-12(富马酸二甲酯)及其他疾病修正疗法治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和混合治疗比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Apr;30(4):613-27. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.863755. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
10
Rituximab for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.利妥昔单抗用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 6;2013(12):CD009130. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009130.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
T cell trafficking in human chronic inflammatory diseases.人类慢性炎症性疾病中的T细胞迁移
iScience. 2024 Jul 16;27(8):110528. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110528. eCollection 2024 Aug 16.