Suppr超能文献

孕期自我监测血压:对BUMP试验中医疗专业人员经验的评估。

Self-monitoring blood pressure in Pregnancy: Evaluation of health professional experiences of the BUMP trials.

作者信息

Chisholm Alison, Tucker Katherine L, Crawford Carole, Green Marcus, Greenfield Sheila, Hodgkinson James, Lavallee Layla, Leeson Paul, Mackillop Lucy, McCourt Christine, Sandall Jane, Wilson Hannah, Chappell Lucy C, McManus Richard J, Hinton Lisa

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.

Action on Pre-eclampsia, The Stables, 80 B High Street, Evesham, Worcestershire, UK.

出版信息

Pregnancy Hypertens. 2024 Mar;35:88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2024.01.134. Epub 2024 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The BUMP trials evaluated a self-monitoring of blood pressure intervention in addition to usual care, testing whether they improved detection or control of hypertension for women at risk of hypertension or with hypertension during pregnancy. This process evaluation aimed to understand healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences of the BUMP trials of self-monitoring of blood pressure during pregnancy.

METHODS

Twenty-two in-depth qualitative interviews and an online survey with 328 healthcare professionals providing care for pregnant people in the BUMP trials were carried out across five maternity units in England.

RESULTS

Analysis used Normalisation Process Theory to identify factors required for successful implementation and integration into routine practice. Healthcare professionals felt self-monitoring of blood pressure did not over-medicalise pregnancy for women with, or at risk of, hypertension. Most said self-monitored readings positively affected their clinical encounters and professional roles, provided additive information on which to base decisions and enriched their relationships with pregnant people. Self-monitoring of blood pressure shifts responsibilities. Some healthcare professionals felt women having responsibility to decide on timing of monitoring and whether to act on self-monitored readings was unduly burdensome, and resulted in healthcare professionals taking additional responsibility for supporting them.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite healthcare professionals' early concerns that self-monitoring of blood pressure might over-medicalise pregnancy, our analysis shows the opposite was the case when used in the care of pregnant people with, or at higher risk of, hypertension. While professionals retained ultimate clinical responsibility, they viewed self-monitoring of blood pressure as a means of sharing responsibility and empowering women to understand their bodies, to make judgements and decisions, and to contribute to their care.

摘要

背景

“孕期血压监测与管理促进项目(BUMP)”试验评估了在常规护理基础上增加的血压自我监测干预措施,以测试其是否能改善对有高血压风险或孕期患有高血压的女性的高血压检测或控制情况。本过程评估旨在了解医疗保健专业人员对孕期血压自我监测的“BUMP”试验的看法和经验。

方法

在英格兰的五个产科单位,对参与“BUMP”试验、为孕妇提供护理的328名医疗保健专业人员进行了22次深入的定性访谈和一项在线调查。

结果

分析采用了规范化过程理论,以确定成功实施并融入常规实践所需的因素。医疗保健专业人员认为,对于患有高血压或有高血压风险的女性,血压自我监测不会使孕期医疗化过度。大多数人表示,自我监测的读数对他们的临床接触和专业角色产生了积极影响,提供了用于决策的补充信息,并丰富了他们与孕妇的关系。血压自我监测转移了责任。一些医疗保健专业人员认为,让女性负责决定监测时间以及是否根据自我监测的读数采取行动负担过重,这导致医疗保健专业人员承担了额外的责任来支持她们。

结论

尽管医疗保健专业人员早期担心血压自我监测可能会使孕期医疗化过度,但我们的分析表明,在照顾患有高血压或有更高高血压风险的孕妇时,情况恰恰相反。虽然专业人员保留最终的临床责任,但他们将血压自我监测视为分担责任的一种方式,使女性能够了解自己的身体,做出判断和决策,并参与自身护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验