Terlouw Luke G, van Dijk Louisa J D, van Noord Desirée, Bakker Olaf J, Bijdevaate Diederik C, Erler Nicole S, Fioole Bram, Harki Jihan, van den Heuvel Daniel A F, Hinnen Jan Willem, Kolkman Jeroen J, Nikkessen Suzan, van Petersen André S, Smits Henk F M, Verhagen Hence J M, de Vries Annemarie C, de Vries Jean-Paul P M, Vroegindeweij Dammis, Geelkerken Robert H, Bruno Marco J, Moelker Adriaan
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Apr;9(4):299-309. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00402-8. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
Mesenteric artery stenting with a bare-metal stent is the current treatment for atherosclerotic chronic mesenteric ischaemia. Long-term patency of bare-metal stents is unsatisfactory due to in-stent intimal hyperplasia. Use of covered stents might improve long-term patency. We aimed to compare the patency of covered stents and bare-metal stents in patients with chronic mesenteric ischaemia.
We conducted a multicentre, patient-blinded and investigator-blinded, randomised controlled trial including patients with chronic mesenteric ischaemia undergoing mesenteric artery stenting. Six centres in the Netherlands participated in this study, including two national chronic mesenteric ischaemia expert centres. Patients aged 18 years or older were eligible for inclusion when an endovascular mesenteric artery revascularisation was scheduled and a consensus diagnosis of chronic mesenteric ischaemia was made by a multidisciplinary team of gastroenterologists, interventional radiologists, and vascular surgeons. Exclusion criteria were stenosis length of 25 mm or greater, stenosis caused by median arcuate ligament syndrome or vasculitis, contraindication for CT angiography, or previous target vessel revascularisation. Digital 1:1 block randomisation with block sizes of four or six and stratification by inclusion centre was used to allocate patients to undergo stenting with bare-metal stents or covered stents at the start of the procedure. Patients, physicians performing follow-up, investigators, and radiologists were masked to treatment allocation. Interventionalists performing the procedure were not masked. The primary study outcome was the primary patency of covered stents and bare-metal stents at 24 months of follow-up, evaluated in the modified intention-to-treat population, in which stents with missing data for the outcome were excluded. Loss of primary patency was defined as the performance of a re-intervention to preserve patency, or 75% or greater luminal surface area reduction of the target vessel. CT angiography was performed at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post intervention to assess patency. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02428582) and is complete.
Between April 6, 2015, and March 11, 2019, 158 eligible patients underwent mesenteric artery stenting procedures, of whom 94 patients (with 128 stents) provided consent and were included in the study. 47 patients (62 stents) were assigned to the covered stents group (median age 69·0 years [IQR 63·0-76·5], 28 [60%] female) and 47 patients (66 stents) were assigned to the bare-metal stents group (median age 70·0 years [63·5-76·5], 33 [70%] female). At 24 months, the primary patency of covered stents (42 [81%] of 52 stents) was superior to that of bare-metal stents (26 [49%] of 53; odds ratio [OR] 4·4 [95% CI 1·8-10·5]; p<0·0001). A procedure-related adverse event occurred in 17 (36%) of 47 patients in the covered stents group versus nine (19%) of 47 in the bare-metal stent group (OR 2·4 [95% CI 0·9-6·3]; p=0·065). Most adverse events were related to the access site, including haematoma (five [11%] in the covered stents group vs six [13%] in the bare-metal stents group), pseudoaneurysm (five [11%] vs two [4%]), radial artery thrombosis (one [2%] vs none), and intravascular closure device (none vs one [2%]). Six (13%) patients in the covered stent group versus one (2%) in the bare-metal stent group had procedure-related adverse events not related to the access site, including stent luxation (three [6%] vs none), major bleeding (two (4%) vs none), mesenteric artery perforation (one [2%] vs one [2%]), mesenteric artery dissection (one [2%] vs one [2%]), and death (one [2%] vs none).
The findings of this trial support the use of covered stents for mesenteric artery stenting in patients with chronic mesenteric ischaemia.
Atrium Maquet Getinge Group.
使用裸金属支架进行肠系膜动脉支架置入术是目前治疗动脉粥样硬化性慢性肠系膜缺血的方法。由于支架内内膜增生,裸金属支架的长期通畅性并不理想。使用覆膜支架可能会提高长期通畅性。我们旨在比较覆膜支架和裸金属支架在慢性肠系膜缺血患者中的通畅性。
我们进行了一项多中心、患者和研究者双盲的随机对照试验,纳入接受肠系膜动脉支架置入术的慢性肠系膜缺血患者。荷兰的六个中心参与了这项研究,其中包括两个全国性慢性肠系膜缺血专家中心。年龄在18岁及以上、计划进行血管内肠系膜动脉血运重建且由胃肠病学家、介入放射科医生和血管外科医生组成的多学科团队达成慢性肠系膜缺血共识诊断的患者符合纳入标准。排除标准为狭窄长度25mm或更长、由正中弓状韧带综合征或血管炎引起的狭窄、CT血管造影的禁忌症或既往靶血管血运重建。在手术开始时,采用数字1:1分组随机化,分组大小为4或6,并按纳入中心分层,将患者分配接受裸金属支架或覆膜支架置入术。患者、进行随访的医生、研究者和放射科医生对治疗分配情况不知情。进行手术的介入医生不设盲。主要研究结局是在24个月随访时覆膜支架和裸金属支架的初始通畅率,在改良意向性分析人群中进行评估,其中排除结局数据缺失的支架。初始通畅性丧失定义为进行再次干预以维持通畅,或靶血管管腔表面积减少75%或更多。在干预后6个月、12个月和24个月进行CT血管造影以评估通畅情况。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT02428582)且已完成。
2015年4月6日至2019年3月11日期间,158例符合条件的患者接受了肠系膜动脉支架置入术,其中94例患者(128枚支架)提供了知情同意并纳入研究。47例患者(62枚支架)被分配至覆膜支架组(中位年龄69.0岁[四分位间距63.0 - 76.5],28例[60%]为女性),47例患者(66枚支架)被分配至裸金属支架组(中位年龄70.0岁[63.5 - 76.�],33例[70%]为女性)。在24个月时,覆膜支架的初始通畅率(52枚支架中的42枚[81%])优于裸金属支架(53枚中的26枚[49%];优势比[OR]4.4[95%置信区间1·8 - 10.5];p<0.0001)。覆膜支架组47例患者中有17例(36%)发生了与手术相关的不良事件,而裸金属支架组47例中有9例(%)(OR 2.4[95%置信区间0.9 - 6.3];p = 0.065)。大多数不良事件与穿刺部位有关,包括血肿(覆膜支架组5例[%],裸金属支架组6例[13%])、假性动脉瘤(5例[11%]对2例[4%])、桡动脉血栓形成(1例[2%]对无)和血管内闭合装置(无对1例[2%])。覆膜支架组6例(13%)患者发生了与手术相关的非穿刺部位不良事件,而裸金属支架组1例(2%)发生了此类事件,包括支架脱位(3例[6%]对无)、大出血(2例[4%]对无)、肠系膜动脉穿孔(1例[2%]对1例[2%])、肠系膜动脉夹层(1例[2%]对1例[2%])和死亡(1例[2%]对无)。
该试验结果支持在慢性肠系膜缺血患者中使用覆膜支架进行肠系膜动脉支架置入术。
阿特rium Maquet Getinge集团。