Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49, Box 7003, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
AAPS J. 2024 Feb 1;26(1):23. doi: 10.1208/s12248-024-00890-1.
Special populations, like geriatric patients, experience altered paracetamol pharmacokinetics (PK), complicating pain management. More PK research is essential to optimize paracetamol (acetaminophen) dosing. Yet, the reference method ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) is not readily available. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the agreement between UPLC-MS/MS and the more accessible colorimetric Roche acetaminophen (ACETA) assay in quantifying paracetamol plasma concentrations, to facilitate PK studies and therapeutic drug monitoring for pain management. Patient data and plasma samples were obtained from a prospective study including geriatric patients admitted to the geriatric wards. ACETA and UPLC-MS/MS assays were performed in two separate laboratories. Bland-Altman plot and Passing-Bablok regression were used to assess agreement. Accuracy was evaluated using the McNemar test for a threshold value of 10 mg/L. Population PK modeling was employed to bridge PK data obtained from both methods (NONMEM 7.5). A total of 242 plasma sample pairs were available from 40 geriatric patients (age range, 80-95 years). Paracetamol plasma concentrations from ACETA (median 9.8 [interquartile range 6.1-14.4] mg/L) and UPLC-MS/MS (9.5 [6.2-14.8] mg/L) did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). No significant proportional nor additive bias was observed between both assay methods. The classification accuracy (at threshold 10 mg/L) was 85% (P = 0.414). The conversion factor between ACETA and UPLC-MS/MS was estimated at 1.06 (relative standard error 5%), yet with a 13.4% (relative standard error 23%) interindividual variability. ACETA assay showed no systematic bias in comparison with the UPLC-MS/MS assay in determining paracetamol exposure in geriatric blood samples despite the imprecision.
特殊人群,如老年患者,经历改变的扑热息痛药代动力学(PK),使疼痛管理复杂化。更多的 PK 研究对于优化扑热息痛(醋氨酚)剂量是必要的。然而,参考方法超高效液相色谱-串联质谱(UPLC-MS/MS)并不容易获得。因此,我们旨在评估 UPLC-MS/MS 与更易获得的比色罗氏醋氨酚(ACETA)测定法在定量扑热息痛血浆浓度方面的一致性,以促进 PK 研究和治疗药物监测,用于疼痛管理。患者数据和血浆样本来自一项包括老年病房住院老年患者的前瞻性研究。ACETA 和 UPLC-MS/MS 测定在两个独立的实验室进行。Bland-Altman 图和 Passing-Bablok 回归用于评估一致性。使用 McNemar 检验评估准确性对于 10 mg/L 的阈值。采用 NONMEM 7.5 进行群体 PK 建模以桥接两种方法获得的 PK 数据。共有 40 名老年患者(年龄范围 80-95 岁)的 242 对血浆样本可供使用。ACETA(中位数 9.8 [四分位距 6.1-14.4] mg/L)和 UPLC-MS/MS(9.5 [6.2-14.8] mg/L)的扑热息痛血浆浓度无显著差异(P>0.05)。两种测定方法之间未观察到显著的比例或加性偏倚。分类准确性(在阈值 10 mg/L 时)为 85%(P=0.414)。ACETA 和 UPLC-MS/MS 之间的转换因子估计为 1.06(相对标准误差 5%),但个体间变异性为 13.4%(相对标准误差 23%)。尽管存在不精密度,但与 UPLC-MS/MS 测定法相比,ACETA 测定法在确定老年血样中的扑热息痛暴露方面没有系统偏差。