Suppr超能文献

原发性皮肤恶性黑色素瘤的外科治疗

Surgery for primary cutaneous malignant melanoma.

作者信息

Roses D F, Harris M N, Gumport S L

出版信息

Dermatol Clin. 1985 Apr;3(2):315-26.

PMID:3830494
Abstract

In summary, we believe that in the following situations elective regional lymph node dissection should not usually be performed: Patients whose primary malignant melanomas are in situ or have a maximal thickness of less than 1.0 mm. The incidence of regional node metastases in the latter group is so low that regional lymph node dissection is not justified. Patients whose primary malignant melanomas are in the midline of the head and neck or the trunk. Bilateral nodal dissections in these two regions of the body in the absence of a clearly demonstrable therapeutic advantage are not justified. Whether radioisotopic localizing studies will add greater definition to this group remains to be seen. Elderly patients or those with serious intercurrent disease. They should not undergo elective nodal dissection unless the primary malignant melanoma is very thick and lies directly over its nodal group. Patients with systemic metastases. For all remaining patients, the therapeutic or at very least prognostic advantages of elective regional lymph node dissections have been outlined. Conversely, an adverse effect on the course of the disease has never been demonstrated. We adhere to a policy that includes these procedures as primary therapy, provided they are performed with minimal morbidity. Should a surgeon elect not to perform such a procedure in the absence of clinically suspicious lymphadenopathy, careful clinical evaluation at 2-month intervals for the first 2 to 3 years following primary excision, with more prolonged intervals thereafter, would appear prudent. Until such time as effective means of eradicating systemic metastatic malignant melanoma exist, surgery remains the treatment of choice for this potentially fatal neoplasm. Efforts to develop effective adjuvant treatment based on the precise means of delineating prognosis that have thus far been developed has eluded investigators. A reasoned surgical approach is still required in our judgment until the identification and treatment of premalignant precursor lesions are universal or effective systemic therapy is available.

摘要

总之,我们认为在以下情况下通常不应进行选择性区域淋巴结清扫术:原发性恶性黑色素瘤为原位癌或最大厚度小于1.0mm的患者。后一组患者区域淋巴结转移的发生率极低,因此进行区域淋巴结清扫术并不合理。原发性恶性黑色素瘤位于头颈部或躯干中线的患者。在这两个身体区域进行双侧淋巴结清扫,若没有明显的治疗优势,则不合理。放射性同位素定位研究是否会为这组患者提供更明确的诊断尚有待观察。老年患者或患有严重并发疾病的患者。除非原发性恶性黑色素瘤非常厚且直接位于其淋巴结群上方,否则他们不应接受选择性淋巴结清扫术。有全身转移的患者。对于所有其他患者,选择性区域淋巴结清扫术的治疗优势或至少预后优势已作概述。相反,从未证明其对疾病进程有不良影响。我们坚持一项政策,即只要手术并发症发生率最低,就将这些手术作为主要治疗方法。如果外科医生在没有临床可疑淋巴结病的情况下选择不进行此类手术,那么在原发切除后的头2至3年内每2个月进行一次仔细的临床评估,此后间隔时间延长,似乎是谨慎的做法。在存在有效根除全身转移性恶性黑色素瘤的方法之前,手术仍然是这种潜在致命肿瘤的首选治疗方法。基于迄今为止已开发的精确预后评估方法来开发有效的辅助治疗方法,一直未能成功。在我们看来,在普遍识别和治疗癌前病变或有有效的全身治疗方法之前,仍需要合理的手术方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验