• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习算法评估不同出行目的的行人服务水平。

Evaluating the pedestrian level of service for varying trip purposes using machine learning algorithms.

作者信息

Paul Deborah, Moridpour Sara, Venkatesan Srikanth, Withanagamage Nuwan

机构信息

Department of Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.

Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 2;14(1):2813. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53403-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-53403-7
PMID:38307933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10837161/
Abstract

The pedestrians' feeling of comfort while walking on footpaths varies according to the time of day, environment, and the purpose of the trip. The quality of service offered by pedestrian facilities such as walkways, intersections, and public places is evaluated by the Pedestrian level of service (PLOS) and has been measured from time to time, to upgrade and maintain the sustainable travel choice of people. This paper aims to focus on the level of service based on three main trip purposes such as work, education, and recreation, while considering various path characteristics and pedestrian flow characteristics that affect the pedestrian's feeling of comfort on the walkways. The data has been collected using pedestrian questionnaire surveys and pedestrian sensors in the Melbourne central business district and the significant factors that influence the PLOS for each trip purpose will be chosen using the Mutual Information gain, which is found to be different for each trip purpose. The major influencing factors that affect the PLOS will be used to develop machine learning models for three trip purposes separately using Random Forest and Light-GBM algorithm in Python. The accuracy of prediction using the light GBM model is 0.74 for education, 0.80 for recreation, and 0.70 for work trip purposes. It is found using SHAP which stands for Shapely Additive explanations that the factors such as interpersonal distance, distance from vehicles, construction sites, vehicle volume, traffic noise, and footpath surface are the most influencing variables that affect the PLOS based on three different trip purposes.

摘要

行人在人行道上行走时的舒适感会因一天中的时间、环境以及出行目的而有所不同。诸如人行道、十字路口和公共场所等行人设施所提供的服务质量是通过行人服务水平(PLOS)来评估的,并且会不时进行测量,以提升和维持人们可持续的出行选择。本文旨在聚焦于基于工作、教育和娱乐这三个主要出行目的的服务水平,同时考虑各种影响行人在人行道上舒适感的路径特征和行人流量特征。数据是通过在墨尔本中央商务区进行的行人问卷调查和行人传感器收集的,并且将使用互信息增益来选择影响每种出行目的PLOS的重要因素,结果发现每种出行目的的重要因素各不相同。影响PLOS的主要因素将被用于在Python中分别使用随机森林和Light - GBM算法为三个出行目的开发机器学习模型。使用Light GBM模型进行预测的准确率,教育出行目的为0.74,娱乐出行目的为0.80,工作出行目的为0.70。使用代表Shapely加法解释的SHAP方法发现,人际距离、与车辆的距离、建筑工地、车辆流量、交通噪音和人行道表面等因素是基于三种不同出行目的影响PLOS的最具影响力的变量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/78f3b361ad60/41598_2024_53403_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/1c06cfe449ad/41598_2024_53403_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/00ee35ef9d62/41598_2024_53403_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/6d0fc3515cf1/41598_2024_53403_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/17e744494b45/41598_2024_53403_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/0c96c8131a47/41598_2024_53403_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/828db29ad98b/41598_2024_53403_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/95558e261819/41598_2024_53403_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/e0987a7038b2/41598_2024_53403_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/41bf900cf1f3/41598_2024_53403_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/d0b84e04835d/41598_2024_53403_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/78f3b361ad60/41598_2024_53403_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/1c06cfe449ad/41598_2024_53403_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/00ee35ef9d62/41598_2024_53403_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/6d0fc3515cf1/41598_2024_53403_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/17e744494b45/41598_2024_53403_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/0c96c8131a47/41598_2024_53403_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/828db29ad98b/41598_2024_53403_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/95558e261819/41598_2024_53403_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/e0987a7038b2/41598_2024_53403_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/41bf900cf1f3/41598_2024_53403_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/d0b84e04835d/41598_2024_53403_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/10837161/78f3b361ad60/41598_2024_53403_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the pedestrian level of service for varying trip purposes using machine learning algorithms.使用机器学习算法评估不同出行目的的行人服务水平。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 2;14(1):2813. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53403-7.
2
Exploring factors affecting pedestrians' red-light running behaviors at intersections in China.探索影响中国十字路口行人闯红灯行为的因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Nov;96:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.038. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
3
A comparative study of safe and unsafe signalized intersections from the view point of pedestrian behavior and perception.从行人和感知的角度对安全和不安全信号交叉口的比较研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Nov;132:105218. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
4
Exposure to pedestrian crash based on household survey data: Effect of trip purpose.基于家庭调查数据的行人碰撞暴露:出行目的的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jul;128:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
5
A joint probability model for pedestrian crashes at macroscopic level: Roles of environment, traffic, and population characteristics.宏观层面行人生道路交通事故的联合概率模型:环境、交通和人口特征的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Feb;150:105898. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105898. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
6
Exploring the Determinants of the Severity of Pedestrian Injuries by Pedestrian Age: A Case Study of Daegu Metropolitan City, South Korea.探讨行人年龄对行人伤害严重程度的影响因素:以韩国大邱广域市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;17(7):2358. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072358.
7
Modelling risk factors for fatal pedestrian crashes in Kolkata, India.印度加尔各答致命行人碰撞事故风险因素建模。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2020 Jun;27(2):197-214. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2020.1725894. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
8
Walking Characteristics of Persons with Visually Impairment Crossing Intersections with Audible Pedestrian Signals.视力障碍者在有可听行人信号的路口通行时的行走特征。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;217:633-8.
9
A Geographical and Temporal Risk Evaluation Method for Red-Light Violations by Pedestrians at Signalized Intersections: Analysis and Results of Suzhou, China.一种基于时空风险评估的行人闯红灯行为分析与研究——以苏州市为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 3;19(21):14420. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114420.
10
Quantitative analysis of pedestrian safety at uncontrolled multi-lane mid-block crosswalks in China.中国无控制多车道路段人行横道行人安全的定量分析
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Stacked machine learning models for accurate estimation of shear and Stoneley wave transit times in DSI log.用于在偶极横波成像测井中精确估计剪切波和斯通利波传播时间的堆叠机器学习模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 14;15(1):8821. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93730-x.
2
Advanced transport systems: the future is sustainable and technology-enabled.先进的运输系统:未来是可持续且由技术驱动的。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 24;14(1):9429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59438-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Reflection on modern methods: Revisiting the area under the ROC Curve.对现代方法的反思:重新审视 ROC 曲线下面积。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Aug 1;49(4):1397-1403. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz274.
2
How Does Walkability Change Behavior? A Comparison between Different Age Groups in the Netherlands.步行友好度如何改变行为?荷兰不同年龄段的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 15;17(2):540. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020540.
3
The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study.步行适宜性指数的制定:在邻里生活质量研究中的应用。
Br J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;44(13):924-33. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701. Epub 2009 Apr 29.