Fattore Giovanni, Bobini Michela, Meda Francesca, Pongiglione Benedetta, Baldino Luca, Gandolfi Stefano, Confalonieri Licia, Proietto Manuela, Vecchia Stefano, Cavanna Luigi
Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
CeRGAS, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy.
Health Serv Manage Res. 2025 Feb;38(1):1-9. doi: 10.1177/09514848241229564. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
Life expectancy, quality of life and satisfaction of oncologic patients highly depend on access to adequate specialized services, that consider their conditions in a holistic way. The present study aims to evaluate the introduction of oncology services in an outpatient setting in a mountain village in Northern Italy. The initiative is evaluated using the three pillars of sustainability (social, economic and environmental) as dimensions that are often overlooked by healthcare policy makers. Using micro data on 18,625 interventions, we estimate the number of kilometers saved by patients (reduction of "travel burden" as indicator of social sustainability), the additional travel costs for the NHS (indicator of economic sustainability) and the implied reduction of CO emissions (indicator of environmental sustainability). Over the period July 2016-2021, the decentralized health center delivered 2,292 interventions saving 218,566 km for a corresponding value of €131,140. The additional costs for the NHS was €26,152. The reduction of CO emissions was 32.37 Tons (€5,989). Overall, the socio-economic benefit of reducing travel of care for the patients residing in this remote valley was €110,976. This study adds original understanding of the benefits of decentralizing oncologic care and shows its operational feasibility conditions. Given the modest number of similar projects, it provides evidence to policy makers and, especially, managers who are faced with the challenge to implement the decentralization of specialized services.
肿瘤患者的预期寿命、生活质量和满意度在很大程度上取决于能否获得全面考虑其病情的适当专科服务。本研究旨在评估意大利北部一个山村门诊环境中肿瘤服务的引入情况。该举措以可持续性的三大支柱(社会、经济和环境)作为评估维度,而这些维度往往被医疗政策制定者忽视。利用18625项干预措施的微观数据,我们估算了患者节省的公里数(减少“出行负担”作为社会可持续性指标)、国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的额外出行成本(经济可持续性指标)以及由此带来的二氧化碳排放量减少(环境可持续性指标)。在2016年7月至2021年期间,该去中心化的健康中心提供了2292项干预措施,节省了218566公里,相应价值为131140欧元。NHS的额外成本为26152欧元。二氧化碳排放量减少了32.37吨(价值5989欧元)。总体而言,为居住在这个偏远山谷的患者减少就医出行带来的社会经济效益为110976欧元。本研究为肿瘤护理去中心化的益处提供了独到见解,并展示了其操作可行性条件。鉴于类似项目数量较少,它为面临实施专科服务去中心化挑战的政策制定者,尤其是管理者提供了证据。