• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭医生在基层医疗保健中研究能力建设的策略:系统评价方案。

Strategies for research capacity building by family physicians in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

USF Jardins da Encarnação, ACeS Lisboa Central/Research and Ethics Committee, ARSLVT, Lisbon, Portugal

University Clinic of General and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 2;14(2):e077632. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077632.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077632
PMID:38309767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10840058/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The qualities of primary healthcare (PHC) make it a very relevant environment for research; however, there is still work to be done to enhance the research capabilities of family physicians in healthcare units. Considering there is no ongoing review that specifically addresses this objective, the proposed goal of this scoping review is to determine the depth of the literature on the current strategies that support research capacity building among family physicians in the context of PHC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The scoping review will include studies from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and grey literature, published from 2008 to 2023, that address strategies to promote research capacity building among family physicians in the context of PHC. Only studies published in English, Portuguese or Spanish will be considered. All study designs, including quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies, will be eligible for inclusion. The literature search will be performed from January to March of 2024 and data charting will employ a descriptive-analytical method, systematically summarising study objectives, methodologies, findings and implications. This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols and the review will employ the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This review does not need ethical approval. Peer-reviewed publications, policy summaries, presentations at conferences and involvement with pertinent stakeholders are all part of our outreach approach.

摘要

简介

初级医疗保健(PHC)具有多种特质,使其成为非常适合开展研究的环境;然而,要想提高医疗单位家庭医生的研究能力,仍有许多工作要做。鉴于目前尚无专门针对这一目标的持续审查,本研究旨在确定有关支持 PHC 背景下家庭医生研究能力建设的现行策略的文献深度。

方法和分析

该范围综述将包括 2008 年至 2023 年期间发表的来自 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆和灰色文献的研究,这些研究涉及促进 PHC 背景下家庭医生研究能力建设的策略。仅考虑发表英文、葡萄牙文或西班牙文的研究。所有研究设计,包括定量、定性和混合方法研究,均有资格纳入。文献检索将于 2024 年 1 月至 3 月进行,数据图表将采用描述性分析方法,系统地总结研究目标、方法、发现和意义。本方案遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选报告项目,并且该综述将采用系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目进行范围综述。

伦理和传播

本综述不需要伦理批准。同行评议出版物、政策摘要、会议报告和与相关利益攸关方的参与都是我们传播方法的一部分。

相似文献

1
Strategies for research capacity building by family physicians in primary healthcare: a scoping review protocol.家庭医生在基层医疗保健中研究能力建设的策略:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 2;14(2):e077632. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077632.
2
Efforts to strengthen anatomic pathology diagnostic services for cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.加强撒哈拉以南非洲地区癌症解剖病理学诊断服务的努力:一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 10;15(2):e089425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089425.
3
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Towards integrated mental health services in low-income and middle-income countries: organisation of primary healthcare providers - a scoping review protocol.迈向中低收入国家的精神卫生服务整合:基层医疗保健提供者的组织 - 范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 20;14(2):e079854. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079854.
5
Scoping review protocol to understand the conceptualisation, implementation and practices of health promotion within the context of primary healthcare in Africa.范围综述方案,旨在了解非洲初级卫生保健背景下的健康促进概念化、实施和实践。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):e049084. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049084.
6
Detailed study protocol for systematic scoping review of research on child marriage, 2000-2019.2000-2019 年儿童婚姻研究的系统范围综述详细研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 18;11(3):e043845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043845.
7
Factors influencing primary care access, utilisation and quality of management for patients living with hypertension in West Africa: a scoping review protocol.影响西非高血压患者初级保健获取、利用和管理质量的因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 23;14(1):e077459. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077459.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Collaboration between ambulance services and primary care: a scoping review protocol.救护车服务与基层医疗之间的合作:一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e094516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094516.
10
Elements of organisation of integrated maternity care and their associations with outcomes: a scoping review protocol.整合式产时照护组织要素及其与结局的关联:范围综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 4;14(1):e075344. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075344.

本文引用的文献

1
Time to Invest in Primary Care Research-Commentary on Findings from an Independent Congressionally Mandated Study.是时候投资基层医疗研究了——对一项国会授权的独立研究结果的评论
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2117-2120. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06560-0. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
2
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.范围综述实施的更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
3
Fostering global primary care research: a capacity-building approach.促进全球初级保健研究:一种能力建设方法。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jul;5(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002470.
4
Engaging family medicine residents in research training: An innovative research skills program in Israel.让家庭医学住院医师参与研究培训:以色列的一项创新研究技能计划。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2019 May-Aug;32(2):79-83. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_36_18.
5
Unfinished Business: The Role of Research in Family Medicine.未尽之事:研究在家庭医学中的作用。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jan;17(1):70-76. doi: 10.1370/afm.2323.
6
Strategies to improve research capacity across European general practice: The views of members of EGPRN and Wonca Europe.提高欧洲全科医学研究能力的策略:EGPRN 和 Wonca Europe 成员的观点。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2019 Jan;25(1):25-31. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2018.1546282. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
7
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
8
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
9
Challenges for family medicine research: a global perspective.
Fam Pract. 2019 Mar 20;36(2):99-101. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy044.
10
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.报告定性研究的标准:建议的综合。
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.