Besrour Centre for Global Family Medicine, College of Family Physicians of Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jul;5(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002470.
The Alma Ata and Astana Declarations reaffirm the importance of high-quality primary healthcare (PHC), yet the capacity to undertake PHC research-a core element of high-quality PHC-in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC) is limited. Our aim is to explore the current risks or barriers to primary care research capacity building, identify the ongoing tensions that need to be resolved and offer some solutions, focusing on emerging contexts. This paper arose from a workshop held at the 2019 North American Primary Care Research Group Annual Meeting addressing research capacity building in LMICs. Five case studies (three from Africa, one from South-East Asia and one from South America) illustrate tensions and solutions to strengthening PHC research around the world. Research must be conducted in local contexts and be responsive to the needs of patients, populations and practitioners in the community. The case studies exemplify that research capacity can be strengthened at the (practice), (institutional) and (national policy and international collaboration) levels. Clinicians may lack coverage to enable research time; however, practice-based research is precisely the most relevant for PHC. Increasing research capacity requires local skills, training, investment in infrastructure, and support of local academics and PHC service providers to select, host and manage locally needed research, as well as to disseminate findings to impact local practice and policy. Reliance on funding from high-income countries may limit projects of higher priority in LMIC, and 'brain drain' may reduce available research support; however, we provide recommendations on how to deal with these tensions.
《阿拉木图宣言》和《阿斯塔纳宣言》重申了高质量初级卫生保健(PHC)的重要性,但在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)开展 PHC 研究的能力——这是高质量 PHC 的核心要素——却十分有限。我们旨在探讨当前在初级保健研究能力建设方面面临的风险或障碍,确定需要解决的持续紧张局势,并提供一些解决方案,重点关注新兴背景。本文源于在 2019 年北美初级保健研究小组年会上举行的一次研讨会,该研讨会探讨了在 LMIC 开展研究能力建设的问题。五个案例研究(三个来自非洲,一个来自东南亚,一个来自南美洲)说明了在全球范围内加强 PHC 研究的紧张局势和解决方案。研究必须在当地进行,并针对社区中的患者、人群和从业人员的需求做出响应。案例研究表明,可以在(实践)、(机构)和(国家政策和国际合作)层面加强研究能力。临床医生可能缺乏开展研究的时间;然而,基于实践的研究恰恰是最适合 PHC 的。提高研究能力需要当地的技能、培训、基础设施投资,以及对当地学者和 PHC 服务提供者的支持,以选择、主持和管理当地所需的研究,并将研究结果传播出去,以影响当地的实践和政策。依赖高收入国家的资金可能会限制 LMIC 中优先级更高的项目,并且“人才流失”可能会减少可用的研究支持;然而,我们提供了一些处理这些紧张局势的建议。