Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Biochemistry, Department of Food Science and Technology, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 235, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DIMITRA, Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources, 57001 Thermi, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Food Res Int. 2024 Feb;178:113980. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.113980. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
Incorporation of two sesame cake preparations, differing in fat, 11 % (LF) and 17 % (HF), and protein, 51 % (LF) and 44 % (HF), contents, respectively, into breads at 6, 12 and 20 % wheat flour substitution levels, led to enriched end-products with antioxidants, suitable also to carry the 'high protein' and 'fiber source' nutrition claims (at ≥ 12 % substitution level). Sesame cake decreased wheat dough resistance to mixing and extension, and peak viscosity (empirical rheology), in a concentration-dependent manner, being more pronounced for LF formulations. Breads with LF incorporation ≥ 12 % had lower specific volumes and harder crumb (texture analysis) throughout storage, than control (100 % wheat flour); however, such adverse effects were diminished in HF bread formulations due to the plasticizing and emulsifying action of the sesame cake fat. Calorimetry showed that the sesame cake had no effect on starch retrogradation, but enhanced amylose-lipid complex formation. Antioxidant activity (ABTS, DPPH and FRAP assays), and phenolic acids (ferulic, p-coumaric and sinapic) and lignan (sesaminol glucosides and sesamolin) contents, determined by HPLC-DAD-MS, were higher in LF breads than their HF counterparts. The presence of some sulfur (off-flavor) and pyrazine (nutty flavor) compounds (SPME-GC-MS), as well as the sesame flavor and bitterness (sensory analysis) were of higher intensity in HF breads, while the 6 % LF product received the highest overall acceptability score among all fortified products. Overall, the sesame cake can be a promising ingredient for production of functional wheat bread depending on its composition and fortification level.
将两种不同脂肪含量(11%(LF)和 17%(HF))和蛋白质含量(51%(LF)和 44%(HF))的芝麻饼制备物分别以 6%、12%和 20%的小麦粉替代水平掺入面包中,可使富含抗氧化剂的终产物得到丰富,也适合携带“高蛋白”和“膳食纤维来源”的营养声称(在≥12%替代水平)。芝麻饼以浓度依赖的方式降低了小麦面团的耐揉性和延伸性(经验流变学),LF 配方更为明显。在整个储存过程中,LF 含量≥12%的面包比对照(100%小麦粉)的比容和面包屑更硬(质构分析);然而,由于芝麻饼脂肪的增塑和乳化作用,HF 面包配方的这些不利影响减小。量热法表明,芝麻饼对淀粉回生没有影响,但增强了直链淀粉-脂质复合物的形成。抗氧化活性(ABTS、DPPH 和 FRAP 测定)以及通过 HPLC-DAD-MS 测定的酚酸(阿魏酸、对香豆酸和芥子酸)和木脂素(芝麻素葡萄糖苷和芝麻素)含量,在 LF 面包中高于其 HF 对应物。SPME-GC-MS 检测到一些硫(异味)和吡嗪(坚果味)化合物以及芝麻味和苦味(感官分析)在 HF 面包中更为强烈,而 6%LF 产品在所有强化产品中获得了最高的总体可接受性评分。总体而言,芝麻饼可以成为生产功能性小麦面包的有前途的成分,具体取决于其成分和强化水平。