Werner Brian C, Burrus M Tyrrell, Denard Patrick J, Romeo Anthony A, Lederman Evan, Griffin Justin W, Sears Benjamin
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Ascension Medical Group Seton Orthopedics, Austin, TX, USA.
JSES Int. 2023 Nov 24;8(1):197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.10.012. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Improvements in pain control after shoulder arthroplasty with a reduction in narcotic use continues to be an important postoperative goal. With the increased utilization of stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), it is relevant to compare between stemmed and stemless arthroplasty to assess if there is any association between this implant design change and early postoperative pain.
Patients from a multicenter, prospectively-maintained database who had undergone a stemless aTSA with a minimum of two year clinical follow-up were retrospectively identified. Patients who underwent aTSA with a short stem were identified in the same registry, and matched to the stemless aTSA patients by age, sex and preoperative pain score. The primary study outcome was the Visual Analog Scale pain score. Secondary pain outcomes were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder pain subscore, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder physical symptoms subscore, and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score. Finally, the percentage of patients who could sleep on the affected shoulder was assessed for each group. These pain-related clinical outcomes were assessed and compared preoperatively, and postoperatively at 9 weeks, 26 weeks, one year and two years. For all statistical comparisons, > .05 was considered significant.
124 patients were included in the study; 62 in each group. At 9 weeks after surgery, statistically significantly improved pain control was reported by patients undergoing stemless aTSA, as assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (stemless: 1.5, stemmed: 2.5, = .001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons pain subscore (stemless: 42.4, stemmed: 37.3, < .001), Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Physical Symptoms (stemless: 80.3, stemmed: 73.1, = .006) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (stemless: 58.1, stemmed: 47.4, = .011). Patients who underwent a stemless aTSA were significantly more likely to be able to sleep on the affected shoulder at 9 weeks (29% vs. 11%, odds ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 1.2-8.4, = .014). By 26 weeks postoperatively, there were no differences in all pain-specific outcomes. At two years postoperatively, patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, and strength measures were all similar between the two cohorts.
Stemless aTSA provides earlier improvement in postoperative shoulder pain compared to matched patients undergoing short-stem aTSA. Additionally, earlier return to sleeping on the affected shoulder was reported in the stemless aTSA group. The majority of these differences dissipate by 26 weeks postoperatively and there were no differences in pain, patient-reported outcomes, range of motion or strength measures between stemless and short-stem aTSA at 2 years postoperatively.
全肩关节置换术后改善疼痛控制并减少麻醉药物使用仍是一个重要的术后目标。随着无柄解剖型全肩关节置换术(aTSA)应用的增加,比较有柄和无柄置换术以评估这种植入物设计变化与术后早期疼痛之间是否存在关联具有重要意义。
回顾性确定来自一个多中心、前瞻性维护数据库且接受无柄aTSA并至少有两年临床随访的患者。在同一登记处确定接受短柄aTSA的患者,并按年龄、性别和术前疼痛评分与无柄aTSA患者匹配。主要研究结局是视觉模拟量表疼痛评分。次要疼痛结局是美国肩肘外科医师协会肩部疼痛亚评分、西安大略肩关节炎身体症状亚评分和单评估数字评价评分。最后,评估每组中能够在患侧肩部睡眠的患者百分比。这些与疼痛相关的临床结局在术前以及术后9周、26周、1年和2年进行评估和比较。对于所有统计比较,P>0.05被认为具有显著性。
124例患者纳入研究;每组62例。术后9周,通过视觉模拟量表评估(无柄:1.5,有柄:2.5,P=0.001)、美国肩肘外科医师协会疼痛亚评分(无柄:42.4,有柄:37.3,P<0.001)、西安大略肩关节炎身体症状评分(无柄:80.3,有柄:73.1,P=0.006)和单评估数字评价评分(无柄:58.1,有柄:47.4,P=0.011),接受无柄aTSA的患者报告疼痛控制有统计学显著改善。接受无柄aTSA的患者在9周时更有可能能够在患侧肩部睡眠(29%对11%,优势比3.2,95%置信区间1.2-8.4,P=0.014)。术后26周,所有疼痛特异性结局均无差异。术后两年,两组患者报告的结局、活动范围和力量测量均相似。
与接受短柄aTSA的匹配患者相比,无柄aTSA能使术后肩部疼痛更早得到改善。此外,无柄aTSA组报告更早恢复在患侧肩部睡眠。这些差异中的大多数在术后26周时消失,术后两年无柄和短柄aTSA在疼痛、患者报告的结局、活动范围或力量测量方面均无差异。