Wager John F
School of EECS, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-5501, United States.
ACS Omega. 2024 Jan 19;9(4):5046-5050. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c09577. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
A solid-state tunneling analysis is performed in order to assess whether a given chemical bond type is mediated by quantum mechanical electron tunneling. Four bond types are found to involve tunneling-covalent, ionic, polar covalent, and transition metal bonding. Two bond types do not rely on tunneling-free electron metal and van der Waals bonding. Cohesive energy is large for the four bonds involving tunneling due to tunneling-induced Coulombic energy storage, while it is small for the two bonds that do not involve tunneling. Coulombic energy storage is dynamic for covalent and strong polar covalent bonding, static for ionic bonding, and quasi-static for weak polar covalent bonding, where quasi-static pertains to tunneling times longer than ∼160 fs, the room-temperature vibrational attempt time. The cohesive energy of tungsten (W) is anomalously large, suggesting that chemical bonding in W is mediated by a two-electron d-d tunneling process in which charge polarity flips between WW and WW with every two-electron tunneling event. All six bonds just listed are directly connected bonds, in contradistinction to a hydrogen bond, which is a bridge bond linking two adjacent atoms. A hydrogen bond is mediated by quantum mechanical electron tunneling. However, its cohesive energy is variable and can be either relatively large or very small depending on interatomic spacing.
为了评估给定的化学键类型是否由量子力学电子隧穿介导,进行了固态隧穿分析。发现四种键型涉及隧穿——共价键、离子键、极性共价键和过渡金属键。两种键型不依赖于隧穿——自由电子金属键和范德华键。由于隧穿诱导的库仑能量存储,涉及隧穿的四种键的内聚能较大,而对于不涉及隧穿的两种键,内聚能较小。对于共价键和强极性共价键,库仑能量存储是动态的;对于离子键,是静态的;对于弱极性共价键,是准静态的,其中准静态是指隧穿时间长于约160飞秒(室温振动尝试时间)。钨(W)的内聚能异常大,这表明钨中的化学键是由双电子d-d隧穿过程介导的,在每一次双电子隧穿事件中,电荷极性在WW和WW之间翻转。刚刚列出的所有六种键都是直接连接键,这与氢键不同,氢键是连接两个相邻原子的桥键。氢键是由量子力学电子隧穿介导的。然而,其内聚能是可变的,并且根据原子间距的不同,内聚能可能相对较大,也可能非常小。