Metamotivation in medical education: The 4F conceptual framework.

INTRODUCTION

Several models and frameworks have been developed in the past two decades to explain motivation regulation in different fields. However, a comprehensive framework that explains the dimensions of metamotivation in medical education is lacking. This study aims to address this gap by presenting a conceptual framework to understand metamotivation in medical education.

METHOD

This study was conducted at Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2022-2023. We applied Crawford's guidance on developing a conceptual framework collecting data from three sources: experience, literature, and theory. We developed the initial draft of the conceptual framework by identifying gaps in existing models. A panel of experts reviewed the draft and provided feedback on the framework's generation, explanation, and argumentation. The final model was designed in the form of a graphical presentation.

FINDINGS

The study's conceptual framework clearly distinguishes between motivational challenges and motivational problems, and outlines four phases that explain each phase's importance, components, and implementation process. The first phase focuses on promoting metamotivational knowledge among learners. In the second phase, learners face motivational challenges and aim to manage them optimally to prevent motivational problems. The third phase occurs when a motivational problem arises, and learners use motivational regulation strategies to resolve it. In the fourth and final phase, learners use psychological skills to stabilize and strengthen the metamotivational process.

CONCLUSION

This study's conceptual framework focuses specifically on the context of medical education to provide guidance for future research and interventions on metamotivation. By presenting this framework, we aim to capture the attention of researchers toward the topic of metamotivation and encourage further exploration of its dimensions.