Briggs Nicole L, Ton Mimi, Malen Rachel C, Reedy Adriana M, Cohen Stacey A, Phipps Amanda I, Burnett-Hartman Andrea N, Newcomb Polly A
Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, UW Box #351619, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb 6;24(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03152-8.
Signs and red flag symptoms in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who are below the recommended screening age are often overlooked, leading to delayed diagnosis and worse prognosis. This study investigates how patient pre-diagnostic symptoms are associated with anatomic site of their cancer and whether the association varies by age at CRC diagnosis.
We ascertained CRC patients' experienced symptoms and screening through medical abstractions from an ongoing population-based study of CRC patients identified through a SEER cancer registry (N = 626). We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between symptoms and CRC anatomic site. Additional analyses were stratified by age at diagnosis. Early-onset was defined as less than 50 years of age at CRC diagnosis.
Participants who experienced blood in stool were more likely (odds ratio (95% confidence interval)) to have rectal (vs. colon) cancer (4.37 (3.02, 6.33)), as were patients who experienced changes to stool (1.78 (1.21, 2.60)). Patients diagnosed with colon cancer were more likely to present with abdominal pain (0.30 (0.19, 0.47)), anemia (0.40 (0.21, 0.75)), other symptoms (0.33 (0.19, 0.55)) and no symptoms (0.68 (0.44, 1.04)). When stratifying by age at diagnosis, we found that the association between blood in stool and rectal tumor location was particularly pronounced for patients with early-onset CRC (6.48 (2.73, 15.41)).
Common pre-diagnostic red flag symptoms are associated with CRC anatomic site. These findings can inform best practices for gastroenterologist triage of care and early evaluation of CRC and are of key importance given the rise of early-onset (pre-screening age) CRC.
Not applicable to this study and analysis.
在低于推荐筛查年龄的结直肠癌(CRC)患者中,体征和警示症状常常被忽视,从而导致诊断延迟和预后较差。本研究调查患者诊断前的症状如何与癌症的解剖部位相关,以及这种关联是否因CRC诊断时的年龄而异。
我们通过对一项正在进行的基于人群的CRC患者研究进行医学摘要,确定了CRC患者经历的症状和筛查情况,该研究通过监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)癌症登记处识别出患者(N = 626)。我们使用逻辑回归来估计症状与CRC解剖部位之间关联的比值比和95%置信区间。额外的分析按诊断时的年龄进行分层。早发性定义为CRC诊断时年龄小于50岁。
出现便血的参与者患直肠癌(相对于结肠癌)的可能性更高(比值比(95%置信区间))(4.37(3.02,6.33)),出现大便改变的患者也是如此(1.78(1.21,2.60))。被诊断为结肠癌的患者更有可能出现腹痛(0.30(0.19,0.47))、贫血(0.40(0.21,0.75))、其他症状(0.33(0.19,0.55))和无症状(0.68(0.44,1.04))。按诊断时的年龄分层时,我们发现便血与直肠肿瘤位置之间的关联在早发性CRC患者中尤为明显(6.48(2.73,15.41))。
常见的诊断前警示症状与CRC解剖部位相关。这些发现可为胃肠病学家对CRC的分诊护理和早期评估的最佳实践提供参考,鉴于早发性(筛查前年龄)CRC的增加,这一点至关重要。
本研究和分析不适用。