Bedrikovetski Sergei, Murshed Ishraq, Fitzsimmons Tracy, Traeger Luke, Price Timothy J, Penniment Michael, Selva-Nayagam Sudarshan, Vather Ryash, Sammour Tarik
Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Mar;27(3):e70059. doi: 10.1111/codi.70059.
The incidence of early-onset (age <50 years) rectal cancer (EORC) is rising globally, often presenting at an advanced stage. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is increasingly utilised in the management of advanced rectal cancers due to improved response and survival rates. However, it remains unclear whether EORC in an unscreened population responds similarly to TNT compared to average or late-onset (age ≥50 years) rectal cancer (AORC).
This study included consecutive patients treated with curative intent with TNT for rectal cancer at three South Australian hospitals between 2019 and 2024. Patients were divided into EORC and AORC cohorts. The primary outcome was overall complete response (oCR) rate, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a clinical complete response (cCR) and/or pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary outcomes included compliance and treatment-related toxicity.
Of 202 eligible patients, 48 (23.8%) were in the EORC cohort and 154 (76.2%) in the AORC cohort. No significant difference in oCR rate was observed between EORC and AORC patients (43.8% vs. 37.9%, P = 0.470). cCR, pCR and complete M1 response rates were also similar between the two groups. EORC patients experienced significantly less Grade 3-4 chemotherapy-induced toxicity compared to AORC patients (2.1% vs. 25.3%, P < 0.001), but reported higher rates of patient-reported Grade 3-4 radiotherapy-induced toxicity than AORC patients (31.3% vs. 12.3%, P = 0.004).
EORC patients exhibit comparable overall tumour response rates to AORC patients treated with TNT. However, toxicity profiles differ, with EORC patients experiencing less chemotherapy-induced toxicity but more patient-reported radiation-induced toxicity.
全球范围内,早发型(年龄<50岁)直肠癌(EORC)的发病率正在上升,且往往在晚期才出现。由于反应率和生存率的提高,全新辅助治疗(TNT)在晚期直肠癌的治疗中越来越常用。然而,与平均或晚发型(年龄≥50岁)直肠癌(AORC)相比,未筛查人群中的EORC对TNT的反应是否相似仍不清楚。
本研究纳入了2019年至2024年间在南澳大利亚州三家医院接受TNT治疗且有治愈意向的连续直肠癌患者。患者被分为EORC和AORC队列。主要结局是总体完全缓解(oCR)率,定义为实现临床完全缓解(cCR)和/或病理完全缓解(pCR)的患者比例。次要结局包括依从性和治疗相关毒性。
在202例符合条件的患者中,48例(23.8%)在EORC队列,154例(76.2%)在AORC队列。EORC和AORC患者之间未观察到oCR率有显著差异(43.8%对37.9%,P = 0.470)。两组之间的cCR、pCR和完全M1反应率也相似。与AORC患者相比,EORC患者经历的3-4级化疗诱导毒性显著更少(2.1%对25.3%,P < 0.001),但患者报告的3-4级放疗诱导毒性发生率高于AORC患者(31.3%对12.3%,P = 0.004)。
EORC患者与接受TNT治疗的AORC患者表现出相当的总体肿瘤反应率。然而,毒性特征不同,EORC患者经历的化疗诱导毒性较少,但患者报告的放疗诱导毒性较多。