Chen Frank W, Sundaram Vandana, Chew Thomas A, Ladabaum Uri
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 May;15(5):728-737.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.10.038. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in the United States among adults younger than the age of 50 years. Studies of young-onset CRC have focused on outcomes and treatment patterns. We examined patient presentation, provider evaluation, and time to diagnosis, which can affect stage and prognosis.
In a retrospective study, we collected data from patients with a diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, confirmed by pathologists, seen at the Stanford Cancer Institute from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2014. We compared symptoms, clinical features, time to diagnosis, and cancer stage in patients with young-onset CRC (diagnosed at an age younger than 50 years; n = 253) with patients diagnosed with CRC at an age of 50 years or older (n = 232).
A higher proportion of patients with young-onset CRC were diagnosed with advanced-stage tumors (72%) compared with older patients (63%) (P = .03). Larger proportions of patients with young-onset CRC also had a family history of CRC (25% vs 17% in older patients; P = .03), confirmed or probable hereditary cancer syndromes (7% vs 1% in older patients; P < .01), and left-sided disease (distal colon cancer in 41% vs 34% in older patients; P = .01; and rectal cancer in 40% vs 35% in older patients; P = .29). Patients with young-onset CRC had a significantly longer median time to diagnosis (128 vs 79 days for older patients; P < .05), symptom duration (60 vs 30 days for older patients; P < .01), and time of evaluation (31 vs 22 days; P < .05). In multivariable analyses, time to diagnosis was 1.4-fold longer for younger than for older patients (P < .01). Among younger patients, those with stage III or IV CRC had shorter durations of symptoms and evaluations than those with stage I or II CRC.
In a retrospective analysis of patients with CRC, we found that greater proportions of patients younger than 50 years were diagnosed with advanced-stage tumors than older patients; this difference could not be explained simply by delays from symptom onset to diagnosis. Although tumor biology may be an important determinant of stage at diagnosis, clinicians should be aware of CRC alarm symptoms, family history, and genetic syndromes, to speed evaluation and diagnosis of younger patients and potentially improve outcomes. It remains to be determined whether subgroups of persons at risk for young-onset CRC who benefit from early screening can be identified.
在美国,50岁以下成年人的结直肠癌(CRC)发病率正在上升。关于青年发病型CRC的研究主要集中在治疗结果和治疗模式上。我们研究了患者的临床表现、医生评估以及诊断时间,这些因素可能会影响疾病分期和预后。
在一项回顾性研究中,我们收集了2008年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间在斯坦福癌症研究所就诊、经病理学家确诊为结直肠腺癌患者的数据。我们比较了青年发病型CRC患者(诊断年龄小于50岁;n = 253)与50岁及以上CRC确诊患者(n = 232)的症状、临床特征、诊断时间和癌症分期。
与老年患者(63%)相比,青年发病型CRC患者中晚期肿瘤的诊断比例更高(72%)(P = .03)。青年发病型CRC患者中,有CRC家族史的比例也更高(25% 对比老年患者的17%;P = .03),确诊或可能患有遗传性癌症综合征的比例更高(7% 对比老年患者的1%;P < .01),且左侧病变更多(41%为远端结肠癌,对比老年患者的34%;P = .01;40%为直肠癌,对比老年患者的35%;P = .29)。青年发病型CRC患者的中位诊断时间显著更长(老年患者为79天,青年患者为128天;P < .05),症状持续时间更长(老年患者为30天,青年患者为60天;P < .01),评估时间更长(31天对比22天;P < .05)。在多变量分析中,青年患者的诊断时间比老年患者长1.4倍(P < .01)。在年轻患者中,III期或IV期CRC患者的症状和评估持续时间比I期或II期CRC患者短。
在对CRC患者的回顾性分析中,我们发现50岁以下患者被诊断为晚期肿瘤的比例高于老年患者;这种差异不能简单地用从症状出现到诊断的延迟来解释。虽然肿瘤生物学可能是诊断时分期的重要决定因素,但临床医生应了解CRC的警示症状、家族史和遗传综合征,以加快对年轻患者的评估和诊断,并可能改善治疗结果。是否能识别出从早期筛查中获益的青年发病型CRC高危人群亚组,仍有待确定。