Suppr超能文献

紫杉醇联合吉西他滨和 FOLFOX 方案治疗转移性胰腺癌。

-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine and FOLFOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Alcalá University, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid.

Pancreatic Cancer Europe, Brussels.

出版信息

NEJM Evid. 2024 Feb;3(2):EVIDoa2300144. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300144. Epub 2024 Jan 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sequential nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by modified FOLFOX-6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) (nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX) showed a good safety and clinical profile in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) in the phase I SEQUENCE trial. METHODS: The safety and efficacy of sequential nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX was compared with standard nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/Gem) as first-line treatment in a multi-institutional, randomized, open-label, phase II trial in patients with untreated mPDAC. We randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive nab-P/Gem on days 1, 8, and 15 followed by mFOLFOX on day 29 of a 6-week cycle (experimental group) or nab-P/Gem on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle (control group). The primary end point was the 12-month overall survival rate. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were randomly assigned: 78 to nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX and 79 to nab-P/Gem. Patients receiving nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX had a 12-month overall survival of 55.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.2 to 66.5) versus 35.4% (95% CI, 24.9 to 46) in the control group (P=0.02). Similarly, the 24-month survival was 22.4% (95% CI, 13 to 31.8) with nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX versus 7.6% (95% CI, 1.8 to 13.4) with control treatment. The median overall survival was 13.2 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 16.2) with nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX and 9.7 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 12) with nab-P/Gem (hazard ratio for death, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.95). The safety profile showed a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia (35 of 76 vs. 19 of 79 patients, P=0.004), grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia (18 of 78 vs. 6 of 79 patients, P=0.007), and two treatment-related deaths (2.6%) with nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX compared with none with control treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX showed a significantly higher 12-month survival when compared with the standard nab-P/Gem treatment; this came with greater treatment toxicity. (Funded by Celgene; EuCT number, 2014-005350-19; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02504333.)

摘要

背景

在转移性胰腺导管腺癌(mPDAC)的 I 期 SEQUENCE 试验中,序贯 nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨加改良 FOLFOX-6(奥沙利铂、亚叶酸钙和 5-氟尿嘧啶)(nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX)显示出良好的安全性和临床特征。

方法

在一项多机构、随机、开放标签、II 期试验中,比较了序贯 nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX 与标准 nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨(nab-P/Gem)作为未经治疗的 mPDAC 患者的一线治疗。我们将患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配,接受nab-P/Gem 在第 1、8 和 15 天,然后在第 29 天接受 mFOLFOX(实验组)或 nab-P/Gem 在第 1、8 和 15 天的 4 周周期(对照组)。主要终点是 12 个月的总生存率。

结果

共有 157 名患者被随机分配:78 名接受 nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX,79 名接受 nab-P/Gem。接受 nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX 的患者 12 个月总生存率为 55.3%(95%CI,44.2 至 66.5),而对照组为 35.4%(95%CI,24.9 至 46)(P=0.02)。同样,实验组的 24 个月生存率为 22.4%(95%CI,13 至 31.8),而对照组为 7.6%(95%CI,1.8 至 13.4)。nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX 的中位总生存期为 13.2 个月(95%CI,10.1 至 16.2),nab-P/Gem 为 9.7 个月(95%CI,7.5 至 12)(死亡风险比,0.68;95%CI,0.48 至 0.95)。安全性特征显示,中性粒细胞 3 级或以上(35/76 例与 19/79 例,P=0.004)、血小板 3 级或以上(18/78 例与 6/79 例,P=0.007)和 2 例与治疗相关的死亡(2.6%)的发生率较高nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX 与对照组(均无)相比。

结论

与标准 nab-P/Gem 治疗相比,序贯 nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX 显著提高了 12 个月生存率;但治疗毒性更大。(由 Celgene 资助;EuCT 编号,2014-005350-19;ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT02504333。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验