Suppr超能文献

引入小组开卷考试作为医学生临床生物化学课程的学习与评估策略。

Introducing Group Open-Book Exams as a Learning and Assessment Strategy in the Clinical Biochemistry Course for Medical Students.

作者信息

Eldakhakhny Basmah, Alamoudi Aliaa A, Gad Hoda, Almoghrabi Yousef, Shamrani Taghreed, Daghistani Hussam, Bima Abdulhadi, Ajabnoor Ghada, Alfayez Fayza, Elsamanoudy Ayman

机构信息

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Medicine, Jeddah, SAU.

Food, Nutrition, and Lifestyle Research Unit, King Fahd for Medical Research Centre, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jan 7;16(1):e51792. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51792. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Teachers constantly strive to obtain reliable and appropriate teaching and assessment methods to maximize the learning experience. This study aimed to introduce combined modified team-based learning and open-book exams (TBL/OBEs) as learning and assessment strategies in clinical biochemistry for medical students and assess students' perceptions.

METHODS

Second-year medical students enrolled in the clinical biochemistry course were included in this study and subjected to TBL/OBE assessment. The assessment included two parts: the open-book format for half of the questions and the closed-book format for the other as a control. Upon completing the combined TBL/OBE session, the students were required to complete a structured survey to evaluate their perception of the experience. The data were gathered and analyzed. Data were presented as mean±standard error of the mean (SEM), and a p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 358 students completed the TBL/OBE and closed-book exam (CBE) and responded to the survey. Of these students, 76% preferred the OBE, and 84% thought it was a suitable learning method. On the one hand, the mean difficulty of the OBE format was 92.7±1.5 SEM, while, for the CBE, the mean difficulty was 88.7±1.9 SEM (p=0.015). On the other hand, the mean discrimination factor for OBE was 0.26±0.04 and, for the CBE, 0.41±0.04 SEM (p=0.0016). Males found the OBE questions easier (p=0.025) and less stressful (p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

A combined model of modified TBL and OBE is a successful learning and assessment strategy in clinical biochemistry for medical students.

摘要

背景

教师不断努力获取可靠且合适的教学与评估方法,以最大化学习体验。本研究旨在引入组合式改良团队合作学习与开卷考试(TBL/OBE)作为医学生临床生物化学课程的学习与评估策略,并评估学生的看法。

方法

本研究纳入了参加临床生物化学课程的二年级医学生,并对其进行TBL/OBE评估。评估包括两部分:一半问题采用开卷形式,另一半采用闭卷形式作为对照。在完成组合式TBL/OBE课程后,要求学生完成一份结构化调查问卷,以评估他们对该体验的看法。收集并分析数据。数据以平均值±平均标准误差(SEM)表示,p值≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共有358名学生完成了TBL/OBE和闭卷考试(CBE)并参与了调查。在这些学生中,76%更喜欢开卷考试,84%认为这是一种合适的学习方法。一方面,开卷考试形式的平均难度为92.7±1.5 SEM,而闭卷考试的平均难度为88.7±1.9 SEM(p = 0.015)。另一方面,开卷考试的平均区分度为0.26±0.04,闭卷考试为0.41±0.04 SEM(p = (0.0016)。男性认为开卷考试的问题更容易(p = 0.025)且压力更小(p = 0.01)。

结论

改良TBL与OBE的组合模式是医学生临床生物化学课程中一种成功的学习与评估策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f030/10844773/43fcf1d436cc/cureus-0016-00000051792-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验