• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Team-based learning versus Traditional lecture-based learning: An investigation of students' perceptions and academic achievements.基于团队的学习与传统的基于讲座的学习:对学生认知和学业成绩的调查。
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Jul-Aug;37(4):1080-1085. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.4.4000.
2
Team-based learning-adopted strategy in pharmacy education: pharmacology and medicinal chemistry students' perceptions.药学教育中采用的基于团队的学习策略:药理学和药物化学专业学生的看法
Futur J Pharm Sci. 2023;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s43094-023-00464-6. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
3
Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.团队学习与传统讲授法在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学临床生物化学教学中的比较;学习成果和学生满意度。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jul;49(4):546-559. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21501. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
Team-Based Learning and Lecture-Based Learning: Comparison of Sudanese Medical Students' Performance.基于团队的学习与基于讲座的学习:苏丹医学生表现的比较
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Dec 24;12:1513-1519. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S331296. eCollection 2021.
5
Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.在大体解剖实验室中基于团队的学习可提高学业成绩以及学生对团队合作的态度。
Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):95-103. doi: 10.1002/ase.1460. Epub 2014 May 2.
6
Evaluation of Team-Based Learning and Traditional Instruction in Teaching Removable Partial Denture Concepts.基于团队学习和传统教学法在可摘局部义齿概念教学中的效果评估
J Dent Educ. 2015 Sep;79(9):1040-8.
7
Is learning outcome after team based learning influenced by gender and academic standing?基于团队的学习后的学习成果会受到性别和学业成绩的影响吗?
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019 Jan;47(1):58-66. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21197. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
8
The effect of team-based learning on public health students' educational outcomes.基于团队的学习对公共卫生专业学生教育成果的影响。
J Educ Health Promot. 2018 Nov 27;7:140. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_124_17. eCollection 2018.
9
Team-based learning student assessment instrument (TBL-SAI) for assessing students acceptance of TBL in a Saudi medical school. Psychometric analysis and differences by academic year.基于团队学习的学生评估工具(TBL-SAI),用于评估沙特医学生对 TBL 的接受程度。心理测量学分析及其与学年的差异。
Saudi Med J. 2020 May;41(5):542-547. doi: 10.15537/smj.2020.5.25054.
10
Pharmacy students' perceptions and attitudes toward face-to-face vs. virtual team-based learning (TBL) in the didactic curriculum: A mixed-methods study.药学专业学生对理论课程中面对面与虚拟团队学习(TBL)的看法和态度:一项混合方法研究。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2226851. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2226851.

引用本文的文献

1
Team-based learning versus traditional lectures in local anesthesia course: A cross-sectional study exploring dental students' perception and performance.局部麻醉课程中基于团队的学习与传统讲座的比较:一项探索牙科学生认知与表现的横断面研究
Saudi J Anaesth. 2025 Jul-Sep;19(3):266-270. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_582_24. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Study on the effect of simulation-based case teaching method on the preclinical teaching of tooth defects restoration.基于模拟案例教学法对牙体缺损修复临床前期教学效果的研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 5;25(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07010-3.
3
Dynamics of Team-Based Learning in Molecular Biology: Insights and Reflections From Undergraduate Medical Students.分子生物学中基于团队学习的动态过程:来自本科医学生的见解与思考
Cureus. 2024 Dec 22;16(12):e76180. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76180. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Acceptance of team-based learning by students and faculty: A pilot study.学生和教师对基于团队的学习的接受度:一项试点研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 May-Jun;40(5):1001-1005. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.5.8515.
5
Application of lecture-and-team-based learning in stomatology: in-class and online.讲座与团队学习在口腔医学中的应用:课堂内与在线。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 8;24(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05235-2.
6
Comparison of the Effect of Education Using Team-based Learning Method and Lecture Method on Controlling Diabetes in the Elderly: A Quasi-Experimental Study.团队学习法与讲授法在老年糖尿病控制教育效果比较:一项准实验研究。
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2023 Jul;11(3):201-209. doi: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2023.97837.2210.
7
"I really liked the chance to talk about it": Students' Reflections on the Process of Completing Paper Puzzles, a Novel Active Learning Activity.“我真的很喜欢有机会谈论这个话题”:学生对完成纸质拼图这一新型主动学习活动过程的反思。
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Nov 17;32(6):1503-1511. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01682-y. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Effect of team-based learning on critical thinking: A quasi-experimental study.基于团队的学习对批判性思维的影响:一项准实验研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Nov-Dec;38(8):2234-2238. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.8.6146.
9
Application of team-based learning to ophthalmology in China.团队学习在我国眼科学中的应用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;10:922325. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922325. eCollection 2022.
10
Team-based learning versus interactive lecture in achieving learning outcomes and improving clinical reasoning skills: a randomized crossover study.团队学习与互动讲座在实现学习成果和提高临床推理技能方面的比较:一项随机交叉研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 7;22(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03411-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of team-based learning on medical education in China.基于团队学习的医学教育在中国的效果的荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1179-1.
2
Comparison of lecture and team-based learning in medical ethics education.讲座法与小组为基础的学习在医学伦理学教育中的比较。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 May;26(3):903-913. doi: 10.1177/0969733017731916. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
3
Qualitative Analysis of Student Perceptions Comparing Team-based Learning and Traditional Lecture in a Pharmacotherapeutics Course.药学治疗课程中基于团队学习与传统讲座的学生认知定性分析
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Apr;81(3):55. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81355.
4
The long-term impact of team-based learning on medical students' team performance scores and on their peer evaluation scores.基于团队的学习对医学生团队表现分数及其同伴评价分数的长期影响。
Med Teach. 2016 Oct;38(10):1017-1024. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1147537. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
5
Tackling student neurophobia in neurosciences block with team-based learning.通过基于团队的学习解决神经科学课程中学生的神经恐惧症。
Med Educ Online. 2015 Jul 30;20:28461. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28461. eCollection 2015.
6
Student Perceptions of Team-based Learning vs Traditional Lecture-based Learning.学生对基于团队的学习与传统讲座式学习的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 May 25;79(4):51. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79451.
7
Team-based learning as a teaching strategy for first-year medical students.基于团队的学习作为一年级医学生的一种教学策略。
Australas Med J. 2014 Dec 31;7(12):490-9. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2014.2244. eCollection 2014.
8
A comparison of traditional and engaging lecture methods in a large, professional-level course.大型专业课程中传统授课方法与互动式授课方法的比较。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2013 Dec;37(4):347-55. doi: 10.1152/advan.00050.2013.
9
Perceptions and Attitudes of First-Year Medical Students on a Modified Team-Based Learning (TBL) Strategy in Anatomy.一年级医学生对解剖学中改良的基于团队学习(TBL)策略的认知与态度
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012 Aug;12(3):336-43. doi: 10.12816/0003148. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
10
The educational theory basis of team-based learning.团队学习的教育理论基础。
Med Teach. 2012;34(10):796-801. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.687120. Epub 2012 May 30.

基于团队的学习与传统的基于讲座的学习:对学生认知和学业成绩的调查。

Team-based learning versus Traditional lecture-based learning: An investigation of students' perceptions and academic achievements.

作者信息

Nawabi Shazia, Bilal Rabia, Javed Muhammad Qasim

机构信息

Shazia Nawabi, Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia.

Rabia Bilal, Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Jul-Aug;37(4):1080-1085. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.4.4000.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.37.4.4000
PMID:34290787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8281172/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of TBL from students' perspective has been done extensively, but limited studies have analyzed the effect of TBL on students' academic performance. Objectives of the present study were to assess students' perceptions about team-based learning versus traditional lectures and then to compare with students' grades in both TBL and lecture-based assessments.

METHODS

Cross-sectional descriptive study which included 147 dentistry students was conducted between March and June, 2020 at Qassim University, Saudi Arabia. A self-composed 10 item closed ended instrument was administered through electronic mail. One block from each academic year was selected randomly and organizers were requested to provide grades of students in both TBL and lecture-based exams. Grades from A to F were determined as achievement indicator and were compared statistically using Kruskal Wallis, Tuckey Posthoc and Chi-square tests.

RESULTS

A total of 120 students (81.6%) responded to the survey, and mean perception score was (3.29±0.94). Perceptions of students, regarding TBL as a learning strategy were comparatively superior as compared to the lectures. Students scored significantly higher grades in TBL exams (p<0.05) as compared to lecture-based assessments. Gender-wise analysis indicated that female students secured significantly higher grades in the TBL.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that dentistry students perceived TBL as superior teaching and learning strategy compared to traditional lectures. Their perception was verified by their significant higher academic achievements in the assessments for the coursework taught by utilizing team-based learning strategy.

摘要

目的

从学生角度对基于团队的学习(TBL)进行的评估已广泛开展,但分析TBL对学生学业成绩影响的研究有限。本研究的目的是评估学生对基于团队的学习与传统讲座的看法,然后比较学生在TBL和基于讲座的评估中的成绩。

方法

2020年3月至6月在沙特阿拉伯卡西姆大学进行了一项横断面描述性研究,纳入了147名牙科专业学生。通过电子邮件发放一份自编的包含10个封闭式问题的问卷。从每个学年中随机选择一个班级,并要求组织者提供学生在TBL和基于讲座的考试中的成绩。将A到F的成绩作为成绩指标,并使用Kruskal Wallis检验、Tuckey事后检验和卡方检验进行统计学比较。

结果

共有120名学生(81.6%)回复了调查,平均认知得分为(3.29±0.94)。与讲座相比,学生对TBL作为一种学习策略的认知相对更优。与基于讲座的评估相比,学生在TBL考试中的成绩显著更高(p<0.05)。按性别分析表明,女生在TBL中获得的成绩显著更高。

结论

我们得出结论,与传统讲座相比,牙科专业学生认为TBL是更优的教学策略。他们的认知通过在利用基于团队的学习策略教授的课程评估中取得的显著更高的学业成绩得到了验证。