• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Femoral Component Design Is Associated With the Risk of Periprosthetic Femur Fracture After Cementless THA in Patients 65 Years or Older.股骨假体组件设计与65岁及以上患者非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术后假体周围股骨骨折风险相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1485-1493. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002985. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
2
Are There Differences in Performance Among Femoral Stem Brands Utilized in Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures?在用于治疗老年股骨颈骨折的非骨水泥半髋关节置换术中,不同品牌的股骨柄在性能上是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):253-264. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003222. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
3
Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them: what is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture?人工关节周围股骨骨折及如何避免:股骨假体部件设计对人工关节周围股骨骨折风险增加有何影响?
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(1 Supple A):50-59. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0220.R1.
4
What Is the Cumulative Incidence of Femoral Stem Revision and Stem Complication in Cemented and Uncemented Hip Arthroplasty for Proximal Femoral Metastatic Bone Disease?对于股骨近端转移性骨病,骨水泥型和非骨水泥型髋关节置换术中股骨柄翻修及柄并发症的累积发生率是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003541.
5
Vancouver B Fractures After Using Cementless Femoral Fixation: A Single Center Experience.使用非骨水泥型股骨固定后发生的温哥华B型骨折:单中心经验
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Aug;40(8S1):S328-S332. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.024. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
6
What Factors Are Associated With Implant Revision in the Treatment of Pathologic Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures?在病理性股骨转子下骨折的治疗中,哪些因素与植入物翻修相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):473-484. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003291. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
7
Does Stem Design Affect the Incidence of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures? A Secondary Analysis of the HEALTH Trial.柄部设计是否会影响股骨颈骨折人工关节置换术中假体周围股骨骨折的发生率?HEALTH试验的二次分析
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.036.
8
Do Cumulative Revision Rate and First-time Re-revision Rate Vary Between Short and Standard Femoral Stem Lengths? A Multinational Registry Study.短柄与标准柄股骨假体的累积翻修率和首次再次翻修率是否存在差异?一项多国注册研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 1;483(6):1010-1019. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003354. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
9
Is 18 F-fluoride PET/CT an Accurate Tool to Diagnose Loosening After Total Joint Arthroplasty?18F-氟化物PET/CT是诊断全关节置换术后假体松动的准确工具吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):415-428. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003228. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
10
What Is the Incidence of and Outcomes After Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention (DAIR) for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in the AJRR Population?对于 AJRR 人群,清创术、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR)治疗人工关节周围感染的发病率和结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Nov 1;482(11):2042-2051. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003138. Epub 2024 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.髋关节置换术后假体周围股骨骨折的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2494679. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2494679. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
CORR Insights®: Are There Differences in Performance Among Femoral Stem Brands Utilized in Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures?CORR 见解®:在老年股骨颈骨折非骨水泥半髋关节置换术中使用的不同品牌股骨柄的性能是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):265-267. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003266. Epub 2024 Sep 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Causes of Early Hip Revision Vary by Age and Gender: Analysis of Data From a Statewide Quality Registry.早期髋关节翻修的原因因年龄和性别而异:来自全州质量登记处的数据分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7S):S616-S621. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.014. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
Is American Joint Replacement Registry Data Representative of National Data? A Comparative Analysis.美国关节置换登记处数据是否代表全国数据?一项比较分析。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan 1;30(1):e124-e130. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00530.
3
How Does Implant Survivorship Vary with Different Corail Femoral Stem Variants? Results of 51,212 Cases with Up to 30 Years Of Follow-up from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.不同 Corail 股骨柄型号的假体生存率如何变化?来自挪威关节置换登记处的最长 30 年随访的 51212 例结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Oct 1;479(10):2169-2180. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001940.
4
Periprosthetic Femur Fracture Risk: Influenced by Stem Choice, Not Surgical Approach.人工关节周围股骨骨折风险:受柄选择影响,与手术入路无关。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7S):S363-S366. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
5
An Update on Cementless Femoral Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中非骨水泥型股骨固定的最新进展
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Sep 16;102(18):1646-1661. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01397.
6
Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Femur Fracture and Influence of Femoral Fixation Using the Mini-Anterolateral Approach in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.人工全髋关节置换术中原发性假体股骨骨折的危险因素及迷你前外侧入路固定股骨的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Mar;35(3):774-778. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
7
A calcar collar is protective against early periprosthetic femoral fracture around cementless femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty: a registry study with biomechanical validation.在初次全髋关节置换术中,距骨领可预防非骨水泥股骨假体周围早期股骨假体周围骨折:一项具有生物力学验证的注册研究。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7):779-786. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1422.R1.
8
Rates of Total Joint Replacement in the United States: Future Projections to 2020-2040 Using the National Inpatient Sample.美国全关节置换术的比率:利用国家住院患者样本对 2020-2040 年的未来预测。
J Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;46(9):1134-1140. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170990. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
9
Increased risk of intraoperative and early postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture with uncemented stems.使用非骨水泥型股骨柄时,术中及术后早期假体周围股骨骨折风险增加。
Acta Orthop. 2017 Aug;88(4):390-394. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1302908. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
10
Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them: what is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture?人工关节周围股骨骨折及如何避免:股骨假体部件设计对人工关节周围股骨骨折风险增加有何影响?
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(1 Supple A):50-59. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0220.R1.

股骨假体组件设计与65岁及以上患者非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术后假体周围股骨骨折风险相关。

Femoral Component Design Is Associated With the Risk of Periprosthetic Femur Fracture After Cementless THA in Patients 65 Years or Older.

作者信息

Kelly Mackenzie, Chen Antonia F, Ryan Sean P, Working Zachary M, De Ayushmita, Mullen Kyle, Porter Kimberly R, Kagan Ryland

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Department of Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1485-1493. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002985. Epub 2024 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1097/CORR.0000000000002985
PMID:38323976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11272275/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femur fracture is a known complication after THA. The associated risk of cementless femoral component design for periprosthetic femur fracture in a registry population of patients older than 65 years has yet to be clearly identified.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is femoral stem geometry associated with the risk of periprosthetic femur fracture after cementless THA? (2) Is the presence or absence of a collar on cementless femoral implant designs associated with the risk of periprosthetic femur fracture after THA?

METHODS

We analyzed American Joint Replacement Registry data from 2012 to March 2020. Unique to this registry is the high use of cementless femoral stems in patients 65 years and older. We identified 266,040 primary cementless THAs during the study period in patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis and surgeries linked to supplemental Centers for Medicare and Medicaid data where available. Patient demographics, procedure dates, and reoperation for periprosthetic femur fracture with revision or open reduction and internal fixation were recorded. The main analysis was performed comparing the Kheir and Chen classification: 42% (112,231 of 266,040) were single-wedge, 22% (57,758 of 266,040) were double-wedge, and 24% (62,983 of 266,040) were gradual taper/metadiaphyseal-filling cementless femoral components, which yielded a total of 232,972 primary cementless THAs. An additional analysis compared cementless stems with collars (20% [47,376 of 232,972]) with those with collarless designs (80% [185,596 of 232,972]). A Cox proportional hazard regression analysis with the competing risk of death was used to evaluate the association of design and fracture risk while adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

After controlling for the potentially confounding variables of age, sex, geographic region, osteoporosis or osteopenia diagnosis, hospital volume, and the competing risk of death, we found that compared with gradual taper/metadiaphyseal-filling stems, single-wedge designs were associated with a greater risk of periprosthetic femur fracture (HR 2.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 3.9]; p < 0. 001). Compared with gradual taper/metadiaphyseal-filling stems, double-wedge designs showed an increased risk of periprosthetic femur fracture (HR 3.0 [95% CI 2.2 to 4.0]; p < 0. 001). Collarless stems showed an increased risk of periprosthetic fracture compared with collared stems (HR 7.8 [95% CI 4.1 to 15]; p < 0. 001).

CONCLUSION

If cementless femoral fixation is used for THA in patients 65 years or older, surgeons should consider using gradual taper/metadiaphyseal-filling and collared stem designs because they are associated with a lower risk of periprosthetic femur fracture. Future investigations should compare gradual taper/metadiaphyseal-filling and collared cementless designs with cemented fixation in this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

摘要

背景

人工关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折是一种已知的并发症。在年龄大于65岁的登记患者群体中,非骨水泥型股骨假体设计与股骨假体周围骨折的相关风险尚未明确。

问题/目的:(1)非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术后,股骨干几何形状与股骨假体周围骨折风险是否相关?(2)非骨水泥型股骨假体设计中有无领圈与全髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折风险是否相关?

方法

我们分析了2012年至2020年3月的美国关节置换登记数据。该登记的独特之处在于65岁及以上患者中大量使用非骨水泥型股骨干。在研究期间,我们在诊断为骨关节炎且手术与补充医疗保险和医疗补助数据相关联的患者中,识别出266,040例初次非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术。记录患者人口统计学资料、手术日期以及因股骨假体周围骨折进行翻修或切开复位内固定的再次手术情况。主要分析是比较凯尔和陈的分类:42%(266,040例中的112,231例)为单楔型,22%(266,040例中的57,758例)为双楔型,24%(266,040例中的62,983例)为渐缩/干骺端填充型非骨水泥型股骨假体组件,总计232,972例初次非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术。另一项分析比较了有领圈的非骨水泥型股骨干(20% [232,972例中的47,376例])与无领圈设计的股骨干(80% [232,972例中的185,596例])。采用带有死亡竞争风险的Cox比例风险回归分析来评估设计与骨折风险之间的关联,同时对潜在混杂因素进行校正。

结果

在控制了年龄、性别、地理区域、骨质疏松或骨质减少诊断、医院规模以及死亡竞争风险等潜在混杂变量后,我们发现,与渐缩/干骺端填充型股骨干相比,单楔型设计与股骨假体周围骨折风险更高相关(风险比2.9 [95%置信区间(CI)为2.2至3.9];p < 0.001)。与渐缩/干骺端填充型股骨干相比,双楔型设计显示股骨假体周围骨折风险增加(风险比3.0 [95% CI为 2.2至4.0];p < 0.001)。与有领圈的股骨干相比,无领圈的股骨干显示假体周围骨折风险增加(风险比7.8 [95% CI为4.1至15];p < 0.001)。

结论

如果在65岁及以上患者的全髋关节置换术中使用非骨水泥型股骨固定,外科医生应考虑使用渐缩/干骺端填充型和有领圈的股骨干设计,因为它们与股骨假体周围骨折风险较低相关。未来的研究应比较该人群中渐缩/干骺端填充型和有领圈的非骨水泥型设计与骨水泥固定的情况。

证据级别

三级,治疗性研究。