Sorbonne Paris Nord University, Inserm U1153, Inrae U1125, Cnam, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center - University of Paris (CRESS), 74, rue Marcel Cachin, 93017Bobigny, France.
MOISA, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, CIRAD, CIHEAM-IAMM, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Feb 8;27(1):e82. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023002501.
Consideration of future consequences (CFC) distinguishes individuals who adopt behaviours based on immediate needs and concerns from individuals who consider the future consequences of their behaviours. We aimed to assess the association between CFC and diet, and testing the mediating role of food choice motives on this relationship.
Individuals (aged ≥ 18 years) completed the CFC-12 questionnaire in 2014, at least three 24-h dietary records, and a food choice motive questionnaire. A multiple mediator analysis allowed to assess the mediating effect of food choice motives on the cross-sectional association between CFC and diet, adjusted for socio-demographic factors.
Data from the NutriNet-Santé cohort study.
27 330 participants.
CFC was associated with all food choice motives ( < 0·001), with the strongest positive associations for avoidance for environmental reasons, absence of contaminants and health motives and the strongest negative associations for innovation and convenience. Positive total effects were found between CFC and the consumption of healthy food groups (fruits and vegetables, whole-grain foods, legumes), and negative total effects for alcohol, meat and poultry and processed meat ( < 0·001). CFC was positively associated with diet quality ( < 0·001). Across food groups, major mediators of these relationships were higher health (8·4-32·6%), higher environmental (13·7-22·1 %) and lower innovation (7·3-25·1 %) concerns.
CFC was associated with healthier dietary intake, essentially mediated by a greater motivation of future-oriented participants for self-centred and altruistic outcomes, including health and environment. Focusing on the awareness of future benefits in public health interventions might lead to healthier dietary behaviours.
考虑未来后果（CFC）将基于当前需求和关注点行事的个体与考虑自身行为未来后果的个体区分开来。本研究旨在评估 CFC 与饮食之间的关联，并检验食物选择动机在该关系中的中介作用。
2014 年，个体（年龄≥18 岁）完成了 CFC-12 问卷、至少三份 24 小时膳食记录和一份食物选择动机问卷。采用多重中介分析评估了食物选择动机对 CFC 与饮食之间横断面关联的中介作用，同时调整了社会人口学因素。
NutriNet-Santé 队列研究的数据。
27330 名参与者。
CFC 与所有食物选择动机均呈正相关（<0·001），与避免环境原因、无污染物和健康动机呈最强正相关，与创新和便利性呈最强负相关。CFC 与健康食物组（水果和蔬菜、全谷物食品、豆类）的消费呈正相关，与酒精、肉类和禽类以及加工肉类呈负相关（<0·001）。CFC 与饮食质量呈正相关（<0·001）。在各个食物组中，这些关系的主要中介因素是更高的健康（8·4-32·6%）、更高的环境（13·7-22·1%）和更低的创新（7·3-25·1%）关注。
CFC 与更健康的饮食摄入相关，主要由未来导向的参与者对自身和利他的结果（包括健康和环境）的更高关注来介导。在公共卫生干预中关注未来益处可能会导致更健康的饮食行为。
