Zahid Qurat-Ul-Ain, Khursheed Nazia, Adnan Fareeha, Zafar Adeel
Dr. Qurat-ul-Ain Zahid, Department of Pathology, Section of Microbiology Indus Hospital and Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan.
Dr. Nazia Khursheed, FCPS. Department of Pathology, Section of Microbiology Indus Hospital and Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan.
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jan;40(2ICON Suppl):S64-S69. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.2(ICON).8967.
To identify concordance and discordance between GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay and gold standard bacteriologic culture for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in Extra-Pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) specimens in our region.
This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at the Indus Hospital and Health Network. Data from 1 January, 2020 to 31 December, 2021 was analyzed. A total of 1499 EPTB specimens were included for which GeneXpert was requested along with acid-fast bacteria (AFB) culture from the same specimen. Specimens were processed according to specimen type following standard operating procedures of the laboratory. Fluorescent staining was performed on all specimens along with bacteriologic culture. The GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay was carried out in exact accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
Out of 1499 EPTB specimens, 1370 (91.39%) specimens exhibited concordance between GeneXpert and conventional culture method, while 129 (8.60%) specimens showed discordance. GeneXpert exhibited sensitivity and specificity of 69.4% and 94.3% respectively in comparison to culture.
GeneXpert sensitivity for the diagnosis of EPTB varied with the site involved. Lower sensitivity was observed in ascitic and pleural fluids as compared to higher sensitivity observed among urine samples and pus aspirates. However, given the quick turnaround time and ease of use, it is a helpful tool in the diagnosis of EPTB when utilized in the appropriate clinical context. Caution is advised while interpreting negative GeneXpert results in endemic settings and should be interpreted along with other supporting clinical and diagnostic features.
确定在我们地区的肺外结核病(EPTB)标本中,GeneXpert MTB/RIF检测与诊断结核分枝杆菌(MTB)的金标准细菌培养之间的一致性和不一致性。
这是一项在印度河医院和健康网络进行的回顾性横断面研究。分析了2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日的数据。共纳入1499份EPTB标本,对这些标本同时进行了GeneXpert检测和同一标本的抗酸杆菌(AFB)培养。标本按照实验室标准操作程序根据标本类型进行处理。对所有标本进行荧光染色并进行细菌培养。GeneXpert MTB/RIF检测严格按照制造商的说明进行。
在1499份EPTB标本中,1370份(91.39%)标本在GeneXpert检测和传统培养方法之间表现出一致性,而129份(8.60%)标本表现出不一致性。与培养相比,GeneXpert检测的敏感性和特异性分别为69.4%和94.3%。
GeneXpert检测对EPTB的诊断敏感性因受累部位而异。与尿液样本和穿刺脓液中观察到的较高敏感性相比,腹水和胸腔积液中的敏感性较低。然而,鉴于其周转时间短且使用方便,在适当的临床背景下使用时,它是诊断EPTB 的有用工具。在地方病流行地区解读GeneXpert检测阴性结果时应谨慎,应结合其他支持性临床和诊断特征进行解读。