Pournaras Evangelos, Ballandies Mark Christopher, Bennati Stefano, Chen Chien-Fei
School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 3JT, UK.
Computational Social Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland.
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jan 22;3(2):pgae029. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae029. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Collective privacy loss becomes a colossal problem, an emergency for personal freedoms and democracy. But, are we prepared to handle personal data as scarce resource and collectively share data under the doctrine: as little as possible, as much as necessary? We hypothesize a significant privacy recovery if a population of individuals, the data collective, coordinates to share minimum data for running online services with the required quality. Here, we show how to automate and scale-up complex collective arrangements for privacy recovery using decentralized artificial intelligence. For this, we compare for the first time attitudinal, intrinsic, rewarded, and coordinated data sharing in a rigorous living-lab experiment of high realism involving real data disclosures. Using causal inference and cluster analysis, we differentiate criteria predicting privacy and five key data-sharing behaviors. Strikingly, data-sharing coordination proves to be a win-win for all: remarkable privacy recovery for people with evident costs reduction for service providers.
集体隐私丧失成为一个巨大的问题,对个人自由和民主构成紧急情况。但是,我们是否准备好将个人数据视为稀缺资源,并按照“尽可能少,必要时尽可能多”的原则集体共享数据?我们假设,如果一群个体(即数据集体)协调共享最少的数据以运行具有所需质量的在线服务,那么隐私将得到显著恢复。在此,我们展示了如何使用去中心化人工智能来自动化和扩大隐私恢复的复杂集体安排。为此,我们在一个高度逼真的涉及真实数据披露的生活实验室实验中,首次比较了态度性、内在性、奖励性和协调性数据共享。通过因果推断和聚类分析,我们区分了预测隐私的标准和五种关键的数据共享行为。引人注目的是,数据共享协调对各方来说都是双赢:对个人而言隐私显著恢复,对服务提供商来说成本明显降低。