Department of Anaesthesia, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 8;24(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10616-w.
Critical illness is a state of ill health with vital organ dysfunction, a high risk of imminent death if care is not provided and potential for reversibility. The burden of critical illness is high, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Critical care can be provided as Essential Emergency and Critical Care (EECC)- the effective, low-cost, basic care that all critically ill patients should receive in all parts of all hospitals in the world- and advanced critical care- complex, resource-intensive care usually provided in an intensive care unit. The required resources may be available in the hospital and yet not be ready in the wards for immediate use for critically ill patients. The ward readiness of these resources, although harder to evaluate, is likely more important than their availability in the hospital. This study aimed to assess the ward readiness for EECC and the hospital availability of resources for EECC and for advanced critical care in hospitals in Tanzania.
An in-depth, cross-sectional study was conducted in five purposively selected hospitals by visiting all wards to collect data on all the required 66 EECC and 161 advanced critical care resources. We defined hospital-availability as a resource present in the hospital and ward-readiness as a resource available, functioning, and present in the right place, time and amounts for critically ill patient care in the wards. Data were analyzed to calculate availability and readiness scores as proportions of the resources that were available at hospital level, and ready at ward level respectively.
Availability of EECC resources in hospitals was 84% and readiness in the wards was 56%. District hospitals had lower readiness scores (less than 50%) than regional and tertiary hospitals. Equipment readiness was highest (65%) while that of guidelines lowest (3%). Availability of advanced critical care resources was 31%.
Hospitals in Tanzania lack readiness for the provision of EECC- the low-cost, life-saving care for critically ill patients. The resources for EECC were available in hospitals, but were not ready for the immediate needs of critically ill patients in the wards. To provide effective EECC to all patients, improvements are needed around the essential, low-cost resources in hospital wards that are essential for decreasing preventable deaths.
危重病是一种健康状态,伴有重要器官功能障碍,如果不提供治疗,患者即将死亡,而且有可能逆转。危重病的负担很高,特别是在中低收入国家。危重病的救治可以分为基本紧急和重症监护(EECC)和高级重症监护。前者是指所有重病患者在世界上所有医院的所有病房都应得到的有效、低成本、基本的救治,后者是指通常在重症监护病房提供的复杂、资源密集型的救治。所需资源可能在医院内,但在病房中并未准备好立即用于危重病患者。这些资源在病房中的准备情况虽然更难评估,但可能比在医院中的可用性更为重要。本研究旨在评估坦桑尼亚医院 EECC 的病房准备情况以及 EECC 和高级重症监护所需资源的医院可获得性。
在五所通过目的抽样选定的医院进行了深入的横断面研究,通过访问所有病房收集了所有 66 项 EECC 和 161 项高级重症监护资源的需求数据。我们将医院的可获得性定义为资源存在于医院中,病房的准备情况定义为资源在病房中可用、功能正常且存在于为危重病患者护理所需的正确地点、时间和数量。分析数据以计算资源在医院层面的可获得性和在病房层面的准备情况得分,分别为资源在医院层面的可获得性比例和在病房层面的准备情况比例。
医院 EECC 资源的可获得性为 84%,病房的准备情况为 56%。地区医院的准备情况得分(低于 50%)低于区域和三级医院。设备的准备情况最高(65%),而指南的准备情况最低(3%)。高级重症监护资源的可获得性为 31%。
坦桑尼亚医院在提供 EECC 方面准备不足,而 EECC 是挽救危重病患者生命的低成本治疗方法。危重病救治所需的资源可在医院获得,但在病房中尚未为危重病患者的即时需求做好准备。为了向所有患者提供有效的 EECC,需要改进医院病房中必不可少的、低成本的资源,这对于减少可预防的死亡至关重要。