Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Translational Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Apr;49(5):814-823. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01812-7. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) show alterations in both gray matter volume (GMV) and white matter (WM) integrity compared with healthy controls (HC). However, it remains unclear whether the phenotypically distinct BD subtypes (BD-I and BD-II) also exhibit brain structural differences. This study investigated GMV and WM differences between HC, BD-I, and BD-II, along with clinical and genetic associations. N = 73 BD-I, n = 63 BD-II patients and n = 136 matched HC were included. Using voxel-based morphometry and tract-based spatial statistics, main effects of group in GMV and fractional anisotropy (FA) were analyzed. Associations between clinical and genetic features and GMV or FA were calculated using regression models. For FA but not GMV, we found significant differences between groups. BD-I patients showed lower FA compared with BD-II patients (p = 0.006), primarily in the anterior corpus callosum. Compared with HC, BD-I patients exhibited lower FA in widespread clusters (p < 0.001), including almost all major projection, association, and commissural fiber tracts. BD-II patients also demonstrated lower FA compared with HC, although less pronounced (p = 0.049). The results remained unchanged after controlling for clinical and genetic features, for which no independent associations with FA or GMV emerged. Our findings suggest that, at a neurobiological level, BD subtypes may reflect distinct degrees of disease expression, with increasing WM microstructure disruption from BD-II to BD-I. This differential magnitude of microstructural alterations was not clearly linked to clinical and genetic variables. These findings should be considered when discussing the classification of BD subtypes within the spectrum of affective disorders.
与健康对照者(HC)相比,双相障碍(BD)患者的灰质体积(GMV)和白质(WM)完整性均发生改变。然而,表型不同的 BD 亚型(BD-I 和 BD-II)是否也存在脑结构差异仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨 HC、BD-I 和 BD-II 之间 GMV 和 WM 的差异,以及临床和遗传关联。纳入了 N = 73 名 BD-I 患者、n = 63 名 BD-II 患者和 n = 136 名匹配的 HC。使用基于体素的形态测量学和基于束的空间统计学,分析了 GMV 和各向异性分数(FA)的组间主效应。使用回归模型计算了 GMV 或 FA 与临床和遗传特征之间的关联。结果发现,FA 存在显著的组间差异,但 GMV 无差异。与 BD-II 患者相比,BD-I 患者的 FA 较低(p = 0.006),主要在前胼胝体。与 HC 相比,BD-I 患者在广泛的脑区显示出 FA 降低(p < 0.001),包括几乎所有主要的投射、联合和连合纤维束。BD-II 患者的 FA 也低于 HC,但程度较轻(p = 0.049)。在控制了临床和遗传特征后,结果仍然不变,且 FA 或 GMV 与这些特征均无独立关联。我们的研究结果表明,在神经生物学水平上,BD 亚型可能反映了疾病表达的不同程度,从 BD-II 到 BD-I,WM 微观结构的破坏程度逐渐增加。这些微观结构改变的程度与临床和遗传变量没有明显的联系。在讨论情感障碍谱内 BD 亚型的分类时,应考虑这些发现。