Repple Jonathan, Meinert Susanne, Grotegerd Dominik, Kugel Harald, Redlich Ronny, Dohm Katharina, Zaremba Dario, Opel Nils, Buerger Christian, Förster Katharina, Nick Theresa, Arolt Volker, Heindel Walter, Deppe Michael, Dannlowski Udo
Department of Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Bipolar Disord. 2017 Feb;19(1):23-31. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12465. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
The absence of neurobiological diagnostic markers of bipolar disorder (BD) leads to its frequent misdiagnosis as unipolar depression (UD). We investigated if changes in fractional anisotropy (FA) could help to differentiate BD from UD in the state of depression.
Using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) we employed a voxel-based analysis approach to examine fractional anisotropy (FA) in 86 patients experiencing an acute major depressive episode according to DSM-IV (N=39 BD, mean age 39.2 years; N=43 UD, mean age 39.0 years), and 42 healthy controls (HC, mean age 36.1 years). The groups did not differ in sex, age or total education time. FA was investigated in white matter (FA >.2) and hypothesis-driven anatomically defined tracts (region-of-interest [ROI] analysis). Additionally, an exploratory gray matter FA analysis was performed.
White matter analysis showed decreased FA in the right corticospinal tract in UD vs HC and in the right corticospinal tract/superior longitudinal fascicle in BD vs HC and also in BD vs UD. ROI analysis revealed decreased FA in BD vs UD in the corpus callosum and in the cingulum. Gray matter exploratory analysis revealed decreased FA in the left middle frontal gyrus and in the right inferior frontal gyrus in UD vs HC, and in the left superior medial gyrus in BD vs HC.
This is one of very few studies directly showing differences in FA between BD and UD. Gray matter FA changes in prefrontal areas might be precursors for future prefrontal gray matter abnormalities in these disorders.
双相情感障碍(BD)缺乏神经生物学诊断标志物,导致其常被误诊为单相抑郁症(UD)。我们研究了分数各向异性(FA)的变化是否有助于在抑郁状态下区分BD和UD。
我们使用扩散张量成像(DTI),采用基于体素的分析方法,检查了86例根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)经历急性重度抑郁发作的患者(N = 39例BD,平均年龄39.2岁;N = 43例UD,平均年龄39.0岁)以及42名健康对照者(HC,平均年龄36.1岁)的分数各向异性(FA)。这些组在性别、年龄或总受教育时间方面没有差异。在白质(FA >.2)和假设驱动的解剖学定义的神经束(感兴趣区域[ROI]分析)中研究FA。此外,还进行了探索性灰质FA分析。
白质分析显示,与HC相比,UD患者右侧皮质脊髓束的FA降低;与HC相比,BD患者右侧皮质脊髓束/上纵束的FA降低,且BD与UD相比也降低。ROI分析显示,与UD相比,BD患者胼胝体和扣带束的FA降低。灰质探索性分析显示,与HC相比,UD患者左侧额中回和右侧额下回的FA降低,与HC相比,BD患者左侧额上内侧回的FA降低。
这是极少数直接显示BD和UD之间FA差异的研究之一。前额叶区域的灰质FA变化可能是这些疾病未来前额叶灰质异常的先兆。