Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Human Genetics, and Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 May;57(5):1181-1191. doi: 10.1002/eat.24162. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
Trait-level emotion regulation (ER) difficulties are associated with eating disorders (EDs) transdiagnostically. However, little research has examined whether within-person fluctuations in ER longitudinally predict ED behaviors in daily life or the mechanisms of ER effects. Investigating daily ER could help us better understand why people experience ED behaviors at a given time. We examined whether day-to-day changes in adaptive (e.g., cognitive reappraisal) and maladaptive (e.g., rumination) ER longitudinally predicted core ED behaviors (binge eating, purging, dieting) and whether changes in affect mediated effects.
Female participants (N = 688) ages 15-30 from the Michigan State University Twin Registry reported their adaptive and maladaptive ER use, negative affect (NA), positive affect (PA), binge eating, purging, and dieting on 49 consecutive days. Using structural equation modeling, we examined whether within-person fluctuations in ER predicted same- and next-day ED behaviors and whether changes in affect mediated longitudinal ER effects.
Greater maladaptive ER predicted increased likelihood of same-day binge eating and next-day binge eating and purging. The association between maladaptive ER and next-day binge eating and purging was mediated by increased next-day NA. In contrast, dieting was more closely related to changes in PA. Adaptive ER did not predict reduced likelihood of any ED behavior.
Maladaptive ER may longitudinally increase risk for binge eating and purging by amplifying NA. Interventions focused on decreasing maladaptive ER and subsequent NA might help disrupt binge eating-purging cycles. Conversely, results add to evidence that PA fluctuations may play a unique role in maintaining restrictive behaviors.
Little is known about how daily changes in emotion regulation may impact disordered eating. We found that maladaptive emotion regulation (e.g., rumination) was associated with a higher likelihood of binge eating and purging on the next day because it predicted increased next-day negative affect. In contrast, dieting was more closely tied to fluctuations in positive affect. Targeting daily emotion regulation and affective processes may help disrupt cycles of disordered eating.
特质层面的情绪调节(ER)困难与跨诊断 Eating disorders(EDs)有关。然而,很少有研究探讨个体内 ER 的纵向波动是否能预测日常生活中的 ED 行为,或 ER 效应的机制。研究日常 ER 可以帮助我们更好地理解为什么人们在特定时间会出现 ED 行为。我们探讨了个体内适应性(例如,认知重评)和非适应性(例如,反刍)ER 的日常变化是否能预测核心 ED 行为(暴食、催吐、节食),以及情绪变化是否在 ER 效应中起中介作用。
来自密歇根州立大学双胞胎登记处的 15-30 岁女性参与者(N=688)在 49 天内连续报告了他们适应性和非适应性 ER 使用、负性情绪(NA)、正性情绪(PA)、暴食、催吐和节食情况。我们使用结构方程模型,检验了 ER 的个体内波动是否能预测同日和次日的 ED 行为,以及情绪变化是否在 ER 效应的纵向关系中起中介作用。
更多的非适应性 ER 预示着同日暴食和次日暴食、催吐的可能性增加。非适应性 ER 与次日暴食和催吐的关系是由次日 NA 的增加所介导的。相反,节食与 PA 的变化更为密切相关。适应性 ER 不能预测任何 ED 行为的可能性降低。
非适应性 ER 通过放大 NA 可能会增加暴食和催吐的风险。专注于减少非适应性 ER 和随后的 NA 的干预可能有助于打破暴食-催吐循环。相反,结果增加了证据表明,PA 的波动可能在维持限制行为方面起着独特的作用。
关于日常情绪调节的变化如何影响饮食失调,我们知之甚少。我们发现,非适应性情绪调节(例如,反刍)与次日暴食和催吐的可能性增加有关,因为它预示着次日 NA 的增加。相反,节食与 PA 的波动更为密切相关。针对日常情绪调节和情感过程可能有助于打破饮食失调的循环。