• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国西北部非裔、印第安原住民、有色人种农村患者临床试验入组的优势与机遇:一项回顾性研究

Strengths and opportunities to clinical trial enrollment among BIPOC, rural dwelling patients in the northwest United States: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Nelson Jamie M, Johnson Elizabeth, Kiesow Becky, McCrory Bernadette, Ma Jiahui

机构信息

Billings Clinic, Collaborative Science and Innovation Department, Billings, MT, United States.

Mark and Robyn Jones College of Nursing, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 25;15:1309072. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1309072. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2024.1309072
PMID:38333012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10850395/
Abstract

Clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of experimental drugs and devices are the cornerstone of medicinal advancement. Enrolling sufficient participants in these trials is vital to ensure adequate statistical power and generalizability. Clinical trial participation is particularly low among certain populations, including medically underserved communities (i.e., rural areas) and Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC). A retrospective study design was used to understand patient outcomes and access/barriers to clinical trial participation in the rural northwest United States. A quantitatively focused retrospective chart review was conducted for adult participants enrolled in at least one clinical trial in a single northwest health system between 1999 and 2022. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed to assess trial outcomes at a significance level 0.05. The retrospective chart review yielded 833 clinical trial records with 753 individual enrolled participants. The all-cause relative frequency of death at last known follow-up amongst clinical trial participants was 8.90% (n = 67). Based on logistic regression, the death was significantly associated with the participants' age at initial trial screening ( = 0.09, -value <0.001), those that resided in non-metro areas ( = -0.86, -value = 0.045), and those that lived in Northeastern Montana ( = 1.27, -value = 0.025). Additionally, death at last known follow-up was significantly associated with enrollment in 2021-2022 ( = -1.52, -value <0.001), enrolled in more than one study ( = 0.84, -value = 0.023), in internationally sponsored trials ( = -2.08, -value <0.001), in Phase I ( = 5.34, -value <0.001), in Phase II trials ( = 1.37, -value = 0.013), diabetes as a primary trial target ( = -2.04, -value = 0.003). As decentralized trial design and remote or virtual elements of traditional trials become normative, representation of rural and frontier populations is imperative to support the generalizability of trial data encouraged by the FDA.

摘要

研究实验性药物和器械安全性与有效性的临床试验是医学进步的基石。在这些试验中招募足够的参与者对于确保足够的统计效力和普遍性至关重要。在某些人群中,包括医疗服务不足的社区(即农村地区)以及黑人、原住民和有色人种(BIPOC),临床试验参与率特别低。本研究采用回顾性研究设计,以了解美国西北部农村地区患者参与临床试验的结果以及参与的途径/障碍。对1999年至2022年间在单一西北部卫生系统中至少参与一项临床试验的成年参与者进行了以定量为主的回顾性病历审查。进行描述性和推断性统计分析,以在0.05的显著性水平下评估试验结果。回顾性病历审查产生了833条临床试验记录,有753名个体参与试验。在最后一次已知随访时,临床试验参与者的全因死亡相对频率为8.90%(n = 67)。基于逻辑回归分析,死亡与参与者初次试验筛查时的年龄显著相关(β = 0.09,p值<0.001),与居住在非都市地区的参与者显著相关(β = -0.86,p值 = 0.045),与居住在蒙大拿州东北部的参与者显著相关(β = 1.27,p值 = 0.025)。此外,最后一次已知随访时的死亡与2021 - 2022年参与试验显著相关(β = -1.52,p值<0.001),与参与多项研究显著相关(β = 0.84,p值 = 0.023),与国际资助的试验显著相关(β = -2.08,p值<0.001),与I期试验显著相关(β = 5.34,p值<0.001),与II期试验显著相关(β = 1.37,p值 = 0.013),与以糖尿病作为主要试验靶点显著相关(β = -2.04,p值 = 0.003)。随着分散式试验设计以及传统试验的远程或虚拟元素变得常态化,农村和偏远地区人群的代表性对于支持美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)所鼓励的试验数据的普遍性至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff23/10850395/2b89db57659b/fphar-15-1309072-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff23/10850395/ba51d8d7c545/fphar-15-1309072-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff23/10850395/2b89db57659b/fphar-15-1309072-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff23/10850395/ba51d8d7c545/fphar-15-1309072-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff23/10850395/2b89db57659b/fphar-15-1309072-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Strengths and opportunities to clinical trial enrollment among BIPOC, rural dwelling patients in the northwest United States: a retrospective study.美国西北部非裔、印第安原住民、有色人种农村患者临床试验入组的优势与机遇:一项回顾性研究
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 25;15:1309072. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1309072. eCollection 2024.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Enrollment of Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) and female participants in the US diabetes trials spanning 2000 to 2020: A chronological survey.2000 年至 2020 年美国糖尿病试验中纳入的黑种人、原住民和有色人种(BIPOC)和女性参与者:一项按时间顺序进行的调查。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2024 Jul;18(7):103074. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103074. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
4
Increasing Black, Indigenous and People of Color participation in clinical trials through community engagement and recruitment goal establishment.通过社区参与和设定招募目标来增加黑人和原住民以及有色人种参与临床试验的比例。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 19;16(10):e0258858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258858. eCollection 2021.
5
Enrolling people of color to evaluate a practice intervention: lessons from the shared decision-making for atrial fibrillation (SDM4AFib) trial.招募有色人种参与评估实践干预措施:来自心房颤动(SDM4AFib)共享决策试验的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 12;22(1):1032. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08399-z.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
7
Reimagining the joint task force core competency framework for rural and frontier clinical research professionals conducting hybrid and decentralized trials.重新构想农村和偏远地区临床研究专业人员开展混合式和去中心化试验的联合特遣部队核心能力框架。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Dec 21;14:1309073. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1309073. eCollection 2023.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Comparison of Racial, Ethnic, and Geographic Location Diversity of Participants Enrolled in Clinic-Based vs 2 Remote COVID-19 Clinical Trials.比较诊所招募的参与者和 2 项远程 COVID-19 临床试验参与者在种族、民族和地理位置多样性方面的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148325. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48325.
10
Twenty-year trends in racial and ethnic enrollment in large diabetes randomized controlled trials.20 年来大型糖尿病随机对照试验中种族和民族入组的趋势。
BMC Med. 2022 Sep 16;20(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02501-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Signals for change: A regional examination of rural clinical trial participant perspectives on values, health behaviors, and motivations for enrollment and retention in remote settings.变革信号:对农村临床试验参与者在价值观、健康行为以及参与和留在偏远地区试验的动机方面观点的区域考察
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Mar 13;9(1):e77. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.47. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
National Estimates of the Participation of Patients With Cancer in Clinical Research Studies Based on Commission on Cancer Accreditation Data.基于癌症委员会认证数据的癌症患者参与临床研究的全国估计。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jun 20;42(18):2139-2148. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01030. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
2
Recruiting Indigenous Patients Into Clinical Trials: A Circle of Trust.招募原住民患者参与临床试验:建立信任圈。
Ann Fam Med. 2023 Jan-Feb;21(1):54-56. doi: 10.1370/afm.2901.
3
Ineligible, Unaware, or Uninterested? Associations Between Underrepresented Patient Populations and Retention in the Pathway to Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment.
不合格、不知情还是不感兴趣?代表性不足的患者群体与进入癌症临床试验入组途径之间的关联。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Nov;18(11):e1854-e1865. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00359. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
4
Associations between geography, decision-making style, and interest in cancer clinical trial participation.地理环境、决策风格与癌症临床试验参与意愿之间的关联。
Cancer. 2022 Nov 15;128(22):3977-3984. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34455. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
5
The Road Less Traveled: Transportation Barriers to Cancer Care Delivery in the Rural Patient Population.《少有人走的路:农村患者群体中癌症护理提供的交通障碍》。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Sep;18(9):652-662. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00122. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
6
Factors responsible for healthcare avoidance among rural adults in the Eastern Region of North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州东部农村成年人回避医疗保健的因素。
J Community Health. 2022 Oct;47(5):737-744. doi: 10.1007/s10900-022-01106-3. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
7
Participation of rural patients in clinical trials at a multisite academic medical center.农村患者参与多机构学术医疗中心的临床试验。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul 12;5(1):e190. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.813. eCollection 2021.
8
Disparities in phase 1 cancer clinical trial enrollment.癌症临床试验入组中的差异。
Cancer. 2021 Dec 1;127(23):4464-4469. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33853. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
9
Comparative analysis of 1152 African-American and European-American men with prostate cancer identifies distinct genomic and immunological differences.对 1152 名非裔美国男性和欧洲裔美国男性前列腺癌患者进行比较分析,发现了明显的基因组和免疫差异。
Commun Biol. 2021 Jun 3;4(1):670. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02140-y.
10
Persistent Disparity: Socioeconomic Deprivation and Cancer Outcomes in Patients Treated in Clinical Trials.持续存在的差距:临床试验治疗患者的社会经济剥夺与癌症结局。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 20;39(12):1339-1348. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02602. Epub 2021 Mar 17.