• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ineligible, Unaware, or Uninterested? Associations Between Underrepresented Patient Populations and Retention in the Pathway to Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment.不合格、不知情还是不感兴趣?代表性不足的患者群体与进入癌症临床试验入组途径之间的关联。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Nov;18(11):e1854-e1865. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00359. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
2
Associations between geography, decision-making style, and interest in cancer clinical trial participation.地理环境、决策风格与癌症临床试验参与意愿之间的关联。
Cancer. 2022 Nov 15;128(22):3977-3984. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34455. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
3
Investigating potential disparities in clinical trial eligibility and enrollment at an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center.调查在 NCI 指定的综合性癌症中心临床试验资格和入组方面的潜在差异。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jun;12(11):12802-12812. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5933. Epub 2023 May 7.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Broadening Eligibility Criteria and Diversity among Patients for Cancer Clinical Trials.拓宽癌症临床试验患者的资格标准和多样性。
NEJM Evid. 2024 Apr;3(4):EVIDoa2300236. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300236. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
6
Access Denied: Inequities in Clinical Trial Enrollment for Pancreatic Cancer.准入受限:胰腺癌临床试验入组中的不平等现象
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb;29(2):1271-1277. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10868-4. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
7
Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities.参与癌症临床试验:基于种族、性别和年龄的差异。
JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2720-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2720.
8
Disparities in phase 1 cancer clinical trial enrollment.癌症临床试验入组中的差异。
Cancer. 2021 Dec 1;127(23):4464-4469. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33853. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
9
Influence of Clinical Trial Site Enrollment on Patient Characteristics, Protocol Completion, and End Points: Insights From the ASCEND-HF Trial (Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure).临床试验地点入组情况对患者特征、方案完成情况及终点的影响:来自ASCEND-HF试验(奈西立肽治疗失代偿性心力衰竭的临床疗效急性研究)的见解
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.002986.
10
Patient and physician factors associated with participation in cervical and uterine cancer trials: an NRG/GOG247 study.与参与宫颈癌和子宫癌试验相关的患者及医生因素:一项NRG/GOG247研究
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jul;138(1):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.04.033. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Associations Between Patient-Level Factors and Participation in a Breast Cancer Clinical Trial.了解患者层面因素与参与乳腺癌临床试验之间的关联。
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(16):e71010. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71010.
2
Effect of HLA restriction on racial and ethnic disparities in access to immune therapies for advanced synovial sarcoma.HLA限制对晚期滑膜肉瘤免疫治疗可及性方面种族和民族差异的影响。
Oncologist. 2025 Jul 4;30(7). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf193.
3
Barriers to Recruitment and Retention Among Underrepresented Populations in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Qualitative Study of the Perspectives of Clinical Trial Research Coordinating Staff at a Cancer Center.癌症临床试验中代表性不足人群的招募与留用障碍:对某癌症中心临床试验研究协调人员观点的定性研究
J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Nov 1;16:427-441. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S488426. eCollection 2024.
4
Screening log: Challenges in community patient recruitment for gynecologic oncology clinical trials.筛查日志:妇科肿瘤临床试验社区患者招募面临的挑战
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Sep 29;42:101379. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101379. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Gender, race, and ethnicity in lung cancer clinical trial participation: Analysis of 253,845 patients from 2002 to 2021.肺癌临床试验参与中的性别、种族和民族:对2002年至2021年253,845名患者的分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 May;169(5):1346-1353.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.040. Epub 2024 Sep 29.
6
Are community oncology practices with or without clinical research programs different? A comparison of patient and practice characteristics.社区肿瘤学实践是否有临床研究项目有何不同?患者和实践特征的比较。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Jul 1;8(4). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae060.
7
Why location matters: associations between county-level characteristics and availability of National Cancer Oncology Research Program and National Cancer Institute sites.为什么位置很重要:县级特征与国家癌症肿瘤学研究计划和美国国家癌症研究所站点的可及性之间的关联。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Apr 30;8(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae038.
8
Integrating primary care, shared decision making, and community engagement to facilitate equitable access to multi-cancer early detection clinical trials.整合初级保健、共同决策和社区参与,以促进公平参与多癌早期检测临床试验。
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 29;13:1307459. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1307459. eCollection 2023.
9
Strengths and opportunities to clinical trial enrollment among BIPOC, rural dwelling patients in the northwest United States: a retrospective study.美国西北部非裔、印第安原住民、有色人种农村患者临床试验入组的优势与机遇:一项回顾性研究
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 25;15:1309072. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1309072. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Structural Racism In Historical And Modern US Health Care Policy.美国历史和现代医疗保健政策中的结构性种族主义。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Feb;41(2):187-194. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01466.
2
Exclusion criteria of breast cancer clinical trial protocols: a descriptive analysis.乳腺癌临床试验方案排除标准:描述性分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan;191(2):471-475. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06422-1. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
3
Demographic and Health Behavior Factors Associated With Clinical Trial Invitation and Participation in the United States.与临床试验邀请和参与相关的人口统计学和健康行为因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2127792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27792.
4
Clinical trial representativeness and treatment intensity in a real-world sample of women with early stage breast cancer.真实世界早期乳腺癌女性患者临床试验代表性和治疗强度
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Dec;190(3):531-540. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06381-7. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
5
Survival in the Real World: A National Analysis of Patients Treated for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.现实世界中的生存情况:对早期乳腺癌患者的全国性分析。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Feb;18(2):e235-e249. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00274. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
6
Decentralized Clinical Trials: The Future of Medical Product Development?∗.去中心化临床试验:医疗产品开发的未来?∗
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 27;6(4):384-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.01.011. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
Continuing to Broaden Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative and Inclusive: ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Joint Research Statement.持续拓宽资格标准以使临床试验更具代表性和包容性:美国临床肿瘤学会 - 癌症研究之友联合研究声明
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 May 1;27(9):2394-2399. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3852. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
8
"When Offered to Participate": A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Agreement to Participate in Cancer Clinical Trials.“被邀请参与时”:关于患者同意参与癌症临床试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Mar 1;113(3):244-257. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa155.
9
Representativeness of Black Patients in Cancer Clinical Trials Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Compared With Pharmaceutical Companies.与制药公司赞助的癌症临床试验相比,美国国立癌症研究所赞助的癌症临床试验中黑人患者的代表性。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020 Apr 24;4(4):pkaa034. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa034. eCollection 2020 Aug.
10
Synthetic and External Controls in Clinical Trials - A Primer for Researchers.临床试验中的合成对照与外部对照——研究人员入门指南
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 May 8;12:457-467. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S242097. eCollection 2020.

不合格、不知情还是不感兴趣?代表性不足的患者群体与进入癌症临床试验入组途径之间的关联。

Ineligible, Unaware, or Uninterested? Associations Between Underrepresented Patient Populations and Retention in the Pathway to Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment.

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

Genentech, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Nov;18(11):e1854-e1865. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00359. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1200/OP.22.00359
PMID:36178922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9653198/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Cancer clinical trials can benefit current and future patients; however, Black patients, rural residents, and patients living in disadvantaged areas are often underrepresented. Using an adapted version of Unger and colleagues' model of the process of clinical trial enrollment, we evaluated the relationship between underrepresented patient populations and trial end points.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 512 patients with breast or ovarian cancer who were prescribed a therapeutic drug at the University of Alabama at Birmingham from January 2017 to February 2020. Patient eligibility was assessed using open clinical trials. We estimated odds ratios and 95% CIs using logistic regression models to examine the relationship between underrepresented patient populations and trial enrollment end points: eligibility, interest, offer, enrollment, and declining enrollment.

RESULTS

Of the patients in our sample, 27% were Black, 18% were rural residents, and 19% lived in higher disadvantaged neighborhoods. In adjusted models, each comparison group had similar odds of being eligible for a clinical trial. Black versus White patients had 0.40 times the odds of interest in clinical trials and 0.56 times the odds of enrollment. Patients living in areas of higher versus lower disadvantage had 0.46 times the odds of enrolling and 3.40 times the odds of declining enrollment when offered.

CONCLUSION

Eligibility did not drive clinical trial enrollment disparities in our sample; however, retention in the clinical trial enrollment process appears to vary by group. Additional work is needed to understand how interventions can be tailored to each population's specific needs.

摘要

目的

癌症临床试验可以使当前和未来的患者受益;然而,黑人患者、农村居民和居住在不利地区的患者往往代表性不足。我们使用 Unger 及其同事的临床试验入组过程模型的改编版本,评估了代表性不足的患者群体与试验终点之间的关系。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月在阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校接受治疗性药物治疗的 512 例乳腺癌或卵巢癌患者。使用开放临床试验评估患者的入选资格。我们使用逻辑回归模型估计比值比和 95%置信区间,以检查代表性不足的患者群体与试验入组终点之间的关系:入选资格、兴趣、提供、入组和拒绝入组。

结果

在我们的样本中,27%的患者为黑人,18%的患者为农村居民,19%的患者居住在较不利的社区。在调整后的模型中,每个比较组参与临床试验的可能性相似。与白人患者相比,黑人患者对临床试验的兴趣可能性低 0.40 倍,参与临床试验的可能性低 0.56 倍。与生活在较低劣势地区的患者相比,生活在较高劣势地区的患者入组的可能性低 0.46 倍,获得入组机会后拒绝入组的可能性高 3.40 倍。

结论

在我们的样本中,入选资格并没有导致临床试验入组的差异;然而,在临床试验入组过程中的保留率似乎因群体而异。需要进一步的工作来了解如何根据每个群体的具体需求调整干预措施。