Johnson Stephanie, Roberts Stephen, Hayes Sarah, Fiske Amelia, Lucivero Federica, McLennan Stuart, Phillips Amicia, Samuel Gabrielle, Prainsack Barbara
Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Institute for Global Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Public Health Ethics. 2023 Dec 9;16(3):245-260. doi: 10.1093/phe/phad024. eCollection 2023 Nov.
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the concept of solidarity has been invoked frequently. Much interest has centred around how citizens and communities support one another during times of uncertainty. Yet, empirical research which accounts and understands citizen's views on pandemic solidarity, or their actual practices has remained limited. Drawing upon the analysis of data from 35 qualitative interviews, this article investigates how residents in England and Scotland enacted, understood, or criticised (the lack of) solidarity during the first national lockdown in the United Kingdom in April 2020-at a time when media celebrated solidarity as being at an all-time high. It finds that although solidarity was practiced by some people, the perceived lack of solidarity was just as pronounced. We conclude that despite frequent mobilisations of solidarity by policy makers and other public actors, actual practices of solidarity are poorly understood-despite the importance of solidarity for public health and policy.
在整个新冠疫情大流行期间,团结的概念被频繁提及。很多关注点都集中在公民和社区在不确定时期如何相互支持。然而,对公民关于疫情团结的观点或其实际行为进行记录和理解的实证研究仍然有限。本文基于对35次定性访谈数据的分析,调查了2020年4月英国首次全国封锁期间,英格兰和苏格兰的居民是如何践行、理解或批评(团结的缺失)的,当时媒体盛赞团结达到了前所未有的高度。研究发现,尽管一些人践行了团结,但团结缺失的感觉同样明显。我们得出结论,尽管政策制定者和其他公共行为者频繁动员团结,但尽管团结对公共卫生和政策很重要,人们对团结的实际践行却知之甚少。