Department of Philosophy and Classics, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
International Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Mar 24;22(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01830-9.
When the COVID-19 pandemic first took the world by storm, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a Solidarity Call to Action to realize equitable global access to COVID-19 health technologies through pooling of knowledge, intellectual property and data. At the dawn of 2022, 70% of rich countries' populations were vaccinated but only 4.6% of poor countries (Our World In Data, Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccinations, 2022). Vaccine nationalism and rampant self-interest grew and our ineffective global response led to new variants of concern - like Omicron - emerging. Rather than abandon the idea of solidarity in global health, we believe that the international community must embrace it. Solidarity, with its emphasis on relationality and recognition of similarities, could offer fertile ground for building an ethical framework for an interconnected and interdependent world. Such a framework would be better than a framework that focuses principally on individual entitlements. To defend this view, we draw on African relational views of personhood and morality. When humans are conceived of as essentially relational beings, solidarity occupies a central role in moral behaviour. We argue that part of the reason appeals to solidarity have failed may be traced to an inadequate conceptualization of solidarity. For as long as solidarity remains a beautiful notion, practiced voluntarily by generous and kindhearted persons, in a transient manner to respond to specific challenges, it will never be able to offer an adequate framework for addressing inequities in global health in a systematic and permanent way. Drawing on this understanding of solidarity, we propose pathways to respond creatively to the risks we face to ensure equitable access to essential health for all.
当 COVID-19 大流行首次席卷全球时,世界卫生组织(WHO)发出了团结行动呼吁,通过汇集知识、知识产权和数据,实现公平获取 COVID-19 卫生技术。2022 年初,70%的富裕国家的人口已经接种了疫苗,但只有 4.6%的贫穷国家(Our World In Data,Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccinations,2022)。疫苗民族主义和猖獗的自私自利行为不断加剧,我们无效的全球应对措施导致了新的关注变体——如奥密克戎——的出现。我们不应放弃全球卫生团结的理念,而是相信国际社会必须接受它。团结,强调关系性和对相似性的承认,可以为建立一个相互关联和相互依存的世界的伦理框架提供肥沃的土壤。这样的框架将比主要关注个人权利的框架更好。为了捍卫这一观点,我们借鉴了非洲人际关系的观点。当人类被视为本质上是关系性的存在时,团结在道德行为中占据核心地位。我们认为,团结呼吁部分失败的原因可能可以追溯到对团结的概念化不足。只要团结仍然是一个美丽的概念,由慷慨和善良的人自愿实践,以短暂的方式应对特定的挑战,它就永远无法为系统和永久地解决全球卫生不平等问题提供一个足够的框架。借鉴对团结的这种理解,我们提出了创造性应对我们所面临风险的途径,以确保所有人都能公平获得基本的健康。