Gonzales Luis Lobaton, Matos Lennia, Van den Broeck Anja, Burga Andrés
Consortium of Universities, Lima, Peru.
Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, Peru.
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 2;10(3):e25478. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25478. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
According to the self-determination theory (SDT), leaders may adopt a controlling motivational controlling style (CMS) that forces employees to think, feel, or behave in a certain way to promote employee motivation. However, a scale has yet to be developed to measure CMS in the work environment. Usually, researchers use questionnaires adapted to different contexts or designed for another motivational style. However, whether these questionnaires capture the behaviors that represent CMS in the work context is little known. This research aimed to elaborate on and analyze the validity and reliability of the questionnaire on Controlling Motivational Style at Work (CMS-W). The study was based on a literature review of the types of controlling behaviors and a review of questionnaires used by SDT researchers who assessed the controlling motivational style in different contexts. A Peruvian sample of 1100 public sector employees participated. The results show that the short and encompassing CMS-W-11 has a one-dimensional structure with good fit indices: Robust RMSEA = 0.071 with 90 % CI from 0.064 to 0.078; Robust CFI = 0.975; Robust TLI = 0.969; SRMR = 0.025 and good reliability coefficients: Ω = 0.930 and AVE 0.630. Furthermore, it shows convergent validity with controlled motivation (r = 0.260, p < .001) and discriminant validity with autonomous motivation (r = -0.270, p < .001). Moreover, the invariance of the gender category was tested. The fit indices were adequate, and the comparative results between the models were also satisfactory. In addition, the behaviors of the CMS in a work context are conditional negative regard, judging and devaluing, control through objectives, intimidation, and intrusive authority. Therefore, labor organizations will have the CMS-W validated and tested in a work context to evaluate the CMS of leaders and study how it related to the motivation of human capital and organizational objectives.
根据自我决定理论(SDT),领导者可能会采用控制性动机控制风格(CMS),这种风格迫使员工以特定方式思考、感受或行动以促进员工激励。然而,尚未开发出一种量表来衡量工作环境中的CMS。通常,研究人员使用适用于不同情境或为另一种激励风格设计的问卷。然而,这些问卷是否能捕捉到工作情境中代表CMS的行为却鲜为人知。本研究旨在阐述并分析工作中控制性动机风格问卷(CMS-W)的有效性和可靠性。该研究基于对控制性行为类型的文献综述以及对SDT研究人员在不同情境中评估控制性动机风格时所使用问卷的综述。秘鲁1100名公共部门员工的样本参与了研究。结果表明,简短且全面的CMS-W-11具有一维结构,拟合指数良好:稳健RMSEA = 0.071,90%置信区间为0.064至0.078;稳健CFI = 0.975;稳健TLI = 0.969;SRMR = 0.025,可靠性系数良好:Ω = 0.930,AVE = 0.630。此外,它与控制性动机具有收敛效度(r = 0.260,p <.001),与自主动机具有区分效度(r = -0.270,p <.001)。此外,还测试了性别类别的不变性。拟合指数足够,模型之间的比较结果也令人满意。此外,工作情境中CMS的行为包括有条件的消极关注、评判和贬低、通过目标进行控制、恐吓和侵扰性权威。因此,劳动组织将在工作情境中对CMS-W进行验证和测试,以评估领导者的CMS,并研究其与人力资本激励和组织目标的关系。