Djinbachian Roupen, Taghiakbari Mahsa, Alj Abla, Medawar Edgard, Sidani Sacha, Liu Chen Kiow Jeremy, Panzini Benoit, Bouin Mickael, von Renteln Daniel
Gastroenterology, Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada.
Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Endoscopy. 2025 May;57(5):443-450. doi: 10.1055/a-2475-0244. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
Accurate measurement of polyp size during colonoscopy is crucial for informing clinical decisions such as resection technique and surveillance scheduling. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of polyp size measurement when using a virtual scale endoscope (VSE) or snare-based polyp size measurement.This randomized controlled trial enrolled 221 patients undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic outpatient colonoscopies. Study subjects were randomized to have polyps detected during the colonoscopy measured for size either using the VSE or a snare of known size to estimate the size of each polyp. All polyps were measured for reference size directly after their removal from the colon using a digital caliper and before formalin fixation.93 polyps were included in the VSE group and 102 in the snare group. The VSE demonstrated significantly higher relative accuracy (80.0% [95%CI 77.0%-82.9%]) compared with snare-based size estimation (66.4% [95%CI 62.4%-70.5%]; < 0.001). Misclassification rates were lower with the VSE for polyps >2 mm (13.1% vs. 39.3%) and >3 mm (22.6% vs. 55.4%). For diminutive polyps, the VSE better prevented misclassification of >5 mm polyps as 1-5 mm (21.4% vs. 73.0%). The VSE also outperformed snare-based estimation in measuring within 10% of the reference standard size (30.1% vs. 18.6%) and had lower rates of size underestimation (36.5% vs. 65.7%).Using the VSE improves the accuracy of polyp size measurement during colonoscopy in comparison with snare-based size estimation. In clinical scenarios, the VSE reduced misclassifications at clinically relevant size thresholds 2, 3, and 5 mm, which is relevant for the correct choice of polypectomy technique or when implementing resect-and-discard strategies.
在结肠镜检查期间准确测量息肉大小对于指导临床决策(如切除技术和监测计划)至关重要。本研究旨在比较使用虚拟标尺内镜(VSE)或基于圈套器的息肉大小测量方法时息肉大小测量的准确性。
这项随机对照试验纳入了221例接受筛查、监测或诊断性门诊结肠镜检查的患者。研究对象被随机分为两组,在结肠镜检查期间检测到的息肉,一组使用VSE测量大小,另一组使用已知大小的圈套器估计每个息肉的大小。所有息肉在从结肠切除后立即使用数字卡尺测量参考大小,并在福尔马林固定之前进行测量。
VSE组纳入93个息肉,圈套器组纳入102个息肉。与基于圈套器的大小估计(66.4%[95%CI 62.4%-70.5%])相比,VSE显示出显著更高的相对准确性(80.0%[95%CI 77.0%-82.9%];P<0.001)。对于直径>2mm(13.1%对39.3%)和>3mm(22.6%对55.4%)的息肉,VSE的错误分类率更低。对于微小息肉,VSE能更好地防止将>5mm的息肉误分类为1-5mm(21.4%对73.0%)。在测量参考标准大小的10%范围内,VSE也优于基于圈套器的估计(30.1%对18.6%),并且大小低估率更低(36.5%对65.7%)。
与基于圈套器的大小估计相比,使用VSE可提高结肠镜检查期间息肉大小测量的准确性。在临床场景中,VSE降低了在2mm、3mm和5mm这些临床相关大小阈值处的错误分类,这对于正确选择息肉切除术技术或实施切除并丢弃策略具有重要意义。