• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Mixed Methods Analysis of Standardized Documentation of Serious Illness Conversations Within an Electronic Health Record Module During Hospitalization.基于电子病历模块的住院期间严重疾病交流的标准化文档记录的混合方法分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Jan;42(1):14-19. doi: 10.1177/10499091241228269. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
2
Content Analysis of Serious Illness Conversation Documentation: Structured vs. Free-Text Information.严重疾病对话文档的内容分析:结构化与自由文本信息。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Oct;68(4):369-381.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.06.025. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
3
Trained Clinician's Documentation of Serious Illness Conversations and Use of Billing CPT 99497.临床医生对严重疾病谈话的记录和使用计费 CPT 99497。
J Palliat Care. 2022 Jul;37(3):323-331. doi: 10.1177/08258597211049136. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
4
The Association of Standardized Documentation of Serious Illness Conversations With Healthcare Utilization in Hospitalized Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Analysis.严重疾病对话标准化文档记录与住院患者医疗利用的关联:倾向评分匹配队列分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 May;41(5):479-485. doi: 10.1177/10499091231186818. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
How Well are Serious Illness Conversations Documented and What are Patient and Physician Perceptions of These Conversations?严重疾病的沟通记录情况如何?患者和医生对这些沟通的看法如何?
J Palliat Care. 2022 Jul;37(3):332-340. doi: 10.1177/08258597221090387. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
6
Evaluating an Intervention to Improve Communication Between Oncology Clinicians and Patients With Life-Limiting Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of the Serious Illness Care Program.评估一项改善肿瘤临床医生与生命末期癌症患者沟通的干预措施:严重疾病护理计划的一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):801-809. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0292.
7
Clinicians' Perspectives After Implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program: A Qualitative Study.实施重症护理计划后临床医生的观点:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121517. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21517.
8
Behavioral economic implementation strategies to improve serious illness communication between clinicians and high-risk patients with cancer: protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial.改善临床医生与癌症高危患者之间严重疾病沟通的行为经济学实施策略:一项群组随机实用试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2021 Sep 25;16(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01156-6.
9
Who Gets (and Who Should Get) a Serious Illness Conversation in the Hospital? An Analysis of Readmission Risk Score in an Electronic Health Record.谁(以及谁应该)在医院进行严重疾病的对话?电子健康记录中再入院风险评分的分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Jun;40(6):652-657. doi: 10.1177/10499091221129602. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
10
Exploiting Technology to Popularize Goals-of-Care Conversations and Advance Care Planning.利用技术普及目标关怀对话和推进关怀计划。
Crit Care Nurse. 2020 Aug 1;40(4):32-41. doi: 10.4037/ccn2020576.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Strategies to Effective Serious Illness Communication for Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease in the Intensive Care Setting.重症监护环境下终末期肝病患者有效重症疾病沟通的障碍与策略
J Intensive Care Med. 2024 Sep 9:8850666241280892. doi: 10.1177/08850666241280892.

本文引用的文献

1
Who Gets (and Who Should Get) a Serious Illness Conversation in the Hospital? An Analysis of Readmission Risk Score in an Electronic Health Record.谁(以及谁应该)在医院进行严重疾病的对话?电子健康记录中再入院风险评分的分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Jun;40(6):652-657. doi: 10.1177/10499091221129602. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
2
Symptom Management Experience of End-of-Life Family Caregivers: A Population-Based Study.临终患者家庭照顾者症状管理体验的基于人群的研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Dec;64(6):513-520. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.07.017. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
3
Health and social care services for people with dementia at home at the end of life: A qualitative study of bereaved informal caregivers' experiences.居家临终期痴呆患者的卫生和社会保健服务:对丧亲的非正式照护者体验的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jun;36(6):976-985. doi: 10.1177/02692163221092624. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
4
Hospital-associated deconditioning: Not only physical, but also cognitive.医院相关的身体机能衰退:不仅包括身体方面,还包括认知方面。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;37(3). doi: 10.1002/gps.5687.
5
Facilitating family needs and support at the end of life in hospital: A descriptive study.在医院临终关怀中促进家庭需求和支持:一项描述性研究。
Palliat Med. 2022 Mar;36(3):549-554. doi: 10.1177/02692163211066431. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
6
Different Associations Between Inpatient or Outpatient Palliative Care and End-of-Life Outcomes for Hospitalized Patients With Cancer.不同类型的住院癌症患者姑息治疗(门诊或住院)与临终结局的相关性。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Apr;18(4):e516-e524. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00546. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
7
Hospitalizations and emergency department visits trends among elderly individuals in proximity to death: a retrospective population-based study.临近死亡的老年人住院和急诊就诊趋势:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 2;11(1):21472. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00648-1.
8
Navigating the caregiving abyss: A metasynthesis of how family caregivers manage end-of-life care for older adults at home.穿越照护的深渊:关于家庭照护者如何在家中为老年人提供临终关怀的综合分析
Palliat Med. 2022 Jan;36(1):81-94. doi: 10.1177/02692163211042999. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
9
Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life.多学科支持的长期护理临终关怀:改善临终关怀的综合方法。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 22;21(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02271-1.
10
A Yet Unrealized Promise: Structured Advance Care Planning Elements in the Electronic Health Record.尚未实现的承诺:电子健康记录中的结构化预先医疗照护计划要素。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Aug;24(8):1221-1225. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0774. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

基于电子病历模块的住院期间严重疾病交流的标准化文档记录的混合方法分析。

A Mixed Methods Analysis of Standardized Documentation of Serious Illness Conversations Within an Electronic Health Record Module During Hospitalization.

机构信息

Division of General Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Jan;42(1):14-19. doi: 10.1177/10499091241228269. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1177/10499091241228269
PMID:38334010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11566069/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Analysis of documented Serious Illness Conversations (SICs) in the inpatient setting can help clinicians align management to address patient and caregiver needs.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed methods analysis of the first instance of standardized documentation of a SIC within a structured module among hospitalized general medicine patients from 2018 to 2019. Percentage of documentations that included a description of patient or family understanding of the patient's medical condition and use of radio buttons to answer the "prognostic information shared," "hopes," and "worries" modules are reported. Using grounded theory approach, physicians analyzed free text entries to: "What is important to the patient/family?" and "Recommendations or next steps planned."

RESULTS

Out of 5142 patients, 59 patients had a documented SIC. Patient or family understanding of the medical condition(s) was reported in 56 (95%). For "prognostic information shared," the most frequently selected radio buttons were: 49 (83%) incurable disease and 28 (48%) prognosis of weeks to months while those for "hopes" were: 52 (88%) be comfortable and 27 (46%) be at home and for "worries" were: 49 (83%) other physical suffering and 36 (61%) pain. Themes generated from entries to "What's important to patient/family?" included being with loved ones; comfort; mentally and physically present; and reliable care while those for "Recommendations" were coordinating support services; symptom management; and support and communication.

CONCLUSIONS

SIC content indicated concern about pain and reliable care suggesting the complex, intensive nature of caring for seriously ill patients and the need to consider SICs earlier in the life course of patients.

摘要

背景

对住院患者中记录的严重疾病对话(SIC)进行分析,可以帮助临床医生调整治疗方案,以满足患者和护理人员的需求。

方法

我们对 2018 年至 2019 年住院综合医学患者中结构化模块内首次标准化 SIC 记录进行了混合方法分析。报告了记录中包括患者或家属对患者病情的理解以及使用单选按钮回答“预后信息共享”、“希望”和“担忧”模块的描述的文档的百分比。使用扎根理论方法,医生分析了自由文本条目,以回答“对患者/家属重要的是什么?”和“建议或计划的下一步是什么?”

结果

在 5142 名患者中,有 59 名患者记录了 SIC。56 名(95%)患者或家属报告了对医疗状况的理解。在“预后信息共享”方面,最常选择的单选按钮是:49 名(83%)绝症和 28 名(48%)数周至数月的预后,而在“希望”方面是:52 名(88%)舒适和 27 名(46%)在家,在“担忧”方面是:49 名(83%)其他身体痛苦和 36 名(61%)疼痛。“对患者/家属重要的是什么?”条目的主题包括与亲人在一起、舒适、身心同在以及可靠的护理,而“建议”则包括协调支持服务、症状管理以及支持和沟通。

结论

SIC 内容表明对疼痛和可靠护理的关注,这表明照顾重病患者的复杂性和密集性,以及需要更早地考虑患者的生命历程中的 SIC。