Division of General Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Hospital Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Jan;42(1):14-19. doi: 10.1177/10499091241228269. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
Analysis of documented Serious Illness Conversations (SICs) in the inpatient setting can help clinicians align management to address patient and caregiver needs.
We conducted a mixed methods analysis of the first instance of standardized documentation of a SIC within a structured module among hospitalized general medicine patients from 2018 to 2019. Percentage of documentations that included a description of patient or family understanding of the patient's medical condition and use of radio buttons to answer the "prognostic information shared," "hopes," and "worries" modules are reported. Using grounded theory approach, physicians analyzed free text entries to: "What is important to the patient/family?" and "Recommendations or next steps planned."
Out of 5142 patients, 59 patients had a documented SIC. Patient or family understanding of the medical condition(s) was reported in 56 (95%). For "prognostic information shared," the most frequently selected radio buttons were: 49 (83%) incurable disease and 28 (48%) prognosis of weeks to months while those for "hopes" were: 52 (88%) be comfortable and 27 (46%) be at home and for "worries" were: 49 (83%) other physical suffering and 36 (61%) pain. Themes generated from entries to "What's important to patient/family?" included being with loved ones; comfort; mentally and physically present; and reliable care while those for "Recommendations" were coordinating support services; symptom management; and support and communication.
SIC content indicated concern about pain and reliable care suggesting the complex, intensive nature of caring for seriously ill patients and the need to consider SICs earlier in the life course of patients.
对住院患者中记录的严重疾病对话(SIC)进行分析,可以帮助临床医生调整治疗方案,以满足患者和护理人员的需求。
我们对 2018 年至 2019 年住院综合医学患者中结构化模块内首次标准化 SIC 记录进行了混合方法分析。报告了记录中包括患者或家属对患者病情的理解以及使用单选按钮回答“预后信息共享”、“希望”和“担忧”模块的描述的文档的百分比。使用扎根理论方法,医生分析了自由文本条目,以回答“对患者/家属重要的是什么?”和“建议或计划的下一步是什么?”
在 5142 名患者中,有 59 名患者记录了 SIC。56 名(95%)患者或家属报告了对医疗状况的理解。在“预后信息共享”方面,最常选择的单选按钮是:49 名(83%)绝症和 28 名(48%)数周至数月的预后,而在“希望”方面是:52 名(88%)舒适和 27 名(46%)在家,在“担忧”方面是:49 名(83%)其他身体痛苦和 36 名(61%)疼痛。“对患者/家属重要的是什么?”条目的主题包括与亲人在一起、舒适、身心同在以及可靠的护理,而“建议”则包括协调支持服务、症状管理以及支持和沟通。
SIC 内容表明对疼痛和可靠护理的关注,这表明照顾重病患者的复杂性和密集性,以及需要更早地考虑患者的生命历程中的 SIC。