Brown Cristal, Khan Saif, Parekh Trisha M, Muir Andrew J, Sudore Rebecca L
Department of Medicine, University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.
Department of Medicine, Ascension Seton and Seton Family of Doctors, Austin, TX, USA.
J Intensive Care Med. 2024 Sep 9:8850666241280892. doi: 10.1177/08850666241280892.
Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) often require Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission during the disease trajectory, but aggressive medical treatment has not resulted in increased quality of life for patients or caregivers. This narrative review synthesizes relevant data thematically exploring the current state of serious illness communication in the ICU with identification of barriers and potential strategies to improve performance. We provide a conceptual model underscoring the importance of providing comprehensible disease and prognosis knowledge, eliciting patient values and aligning these values with available goals of care options through a series of discussions. Achieving effective serious illness communication supports the delivery of goal concordant care (care aligned with the patient's stated values) and improved quality of life. General barriers to effective serious illness communication include lack of outpatient serious illness communication discussions; formalized provider training, literacy and culturally appropriate patient-directed serious illness communication tools; and unoptimized electronic health records. ESLD-specific barriers to effective serious illness communication include stigma, discussing the uncertainty of prognosis and provider discomfort with serious illness communication. Evidence-based strategies to address general barriers include using the Ask-Tell-Ask communication framework; clinician training to discuss patients' goals and expectations; PREPARE for Your Care literacy and culturally appropriate written and online tools for patients, caregivers, and clinicians; and standardization of documentation in the electronic health record. Evidence-based strategies to address ESLD-specific barriers include practicing with empathy; using the "Best-Case, Worst Case" prognostic framework; and developing interdisciplinary solutions in the ICU. Improving clinician training, providing patients and caregivers easy-to-understand communication tools, standardizing EHR documentation, and improving interdisciplinary communication, including palliative care, may increase goal concordant care and quality of life for critically ill patients with ESLD.
终末期肝病(ESLD)患者在疾病发展过程中常常需要入住重症监护病房(ICU),但积极的药物治疗并未提高患者或护理人员的生活质量。本叙述性综述对相关数据进行了主题综合分析,探讨了ICU中重症疾病沟通的现状,确定了障碍以及提高沟通效果的潜在策略。我们提供了一个概念模型,强调通过一系列讨论提供可理解的疾病和预后知识、引出患者价值观并使这些价值观与可用的护理目标选项相一致的重要性。实现有效的重症疾病沟通有助于提供目标一致的护理(与患者明确表达的价值观相一致的护理)并提高生活质量。有效的重症疾病沟通的一般障碍包括缺乏门诊重症疾病沟通讨论;缺乏正式的医疗人员培训、文化水平以及针对患者的文化适宜的重症疾病沟通工具;以及未优化的电子健康记录。ESLD患者有效重症疾病沟通的特定障碍包括耻辱感、讨论预后的不确定性以及医疗人员对重症疾病沟通的不适感。解决一般障碍的循证策略包括使用询问-告知-询问沟通框架;对临床医生进行培训以讨论患者的目标和期望;为患者、护理人员和临床医生提供PREPARE for Your Care文化水平及文化适宜的书面和在线工具;以及电子健康记录文档的标准化。解决ESLD特定障碍的循证策略包括共情实践;使用“最佳情况、最差情况”预后框架;以及在ICU中制定跨学科解决方案。改善临床医生培训、为患者和护理人员提供易于理解的沟通工具、规范电子健康记录文档以及改善包括姑息治疗在内的跨学科沟通,可能会提高目标一致的护理水平,并改善ESLD重症患者的生活质量。