Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Langauge Studies, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Jul 12;50(3):172-177. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202083.
Social support can mitigate the impact of stress and stigma before or after an abortion. However, stigma anticipation can limit access to in-person support. Informal online spaces can offer opportunities to address unmet support needs including supplementing in-person support lacking within stigmatised contexts. While earlier studies have explored content of posts comprising personal accounts of abortion, little is known about the nuances of how and to what end online spaces are navigated.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted remotely (online or by telephone) with 23 women living in Scotland (aged 20-54 years) recruited through social media and online advertisements. Reflexive thematic analysis was supported by NVivo12 software.
Key themes: obtaining support that was unavailable from in-person networks; preparation for abortion; reducing feelings of isolation. The majority of participants independently searched online for accounts of abortion, with only three receiving any signposting to specific resources. Without guidance, finding relevant, supportive content was not straightforward. The search process was additionally complicated by the prevalence of abortion stigma online, which generated an additional burden at a potentially challenging time. Those who received direction towards particular resources reported primarily positive online experiences.
While online content could address perceived in-person support gaps, the process of finding supportive content without guidance can be complex. Online searching may also expose women to stigmatising material and interactions. Signposting by abortion services towards well-moderated and trustworthy online resources could be constructive in limiting exposure to stigma and misinformation, while allowing those seeking it to access better support.
社会支持可以减轻堕胎前后压力和耻辱感的影响。然而,耻辱感的预期可能会限制获得面对面支持的机会。非正式的在线空间可以提供机会来满足未得到满足的支持需求,包括在存在耻辱化背景的情况下补充面对面支持的不足。虽然早期的研究已经探讨了包含个人堕胎经历的帖子的内容,但对于如何以及出于何种目的在线空间被导航的细微差别知之甚少。
通过社交媒体和在线广告招募了 23 名居住在苏格兰的年龄在 20-54 岁之间的女性,通过远程(在线或电话)进行了半结构式访谈。反思性主题分析得到了 NVivo12 软件的支持。
主要主题:获得无法从面对面网络中获得的支持;堕胎前的准备;减少孤立感。大多数参与者独立在网上搜索堕胎的经历,只有三人收到了特定资源的任何引导。没有指导,找到相关的、支持性的内容并不容易。搜索过程还因网上普遍存在的堕胎耻辱感而变得复杂,这在一个潜在具有挑战性的时期增加了额外的负担。那些收到特定资源指导的人报告了主要的积极在线体验。
虽然在线内容可以解决感知到的面对面支持差距,但在没有指导的情况下找到支持性内容的过程可能很复杂。在线搜索也可能使妇女接触到带有耻辱感的材料和互动。堕胎服务机构将其引导至管理良好和值得信赖的在线资源可能有助于限制接触耻辱感和错误信息,同时允许那些寻求支持的人获得更好的支持。