Independent consultant and former Principal Research Associate of Fundación Oriéntame, Bogotá, Colombia.
Division of Research, Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Reprod Health. 2024 Jun 1;21(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01814-0.
In 2006, a Constitutional Court ruling partially decriminalized abortion in Colombia, allowing the procedure in cases of rape, risk to the health or life of the woman, and fetal malformations incompatible with life. Despite this less prohibitive law, some women and pregnant people preferred self-managing their abortions outside the formal healthcare system, often without accurate information. In 2018, we undertook a study to understand what motivated women to self-manage using medications that they acquired informally. Colombia has since adopted a progressive law in 2022, permitting abortion on request through the 24th week of pregnancy. However, the implementation of this law is still underway. Examining the reasons why women chose to informally self-manage an abortion after 2006 may not only highlight how barriers to legal services persisted at that time, but also could inform strategies to increase knowledge of the current abortion law and improve access to services going forward.
In-depth interviews were conducted in 2018 with 47 women aged 18 and older who used misoprostol obtained outside of health facilities to induce an abortion, and who were receiving postabortion care in two private clinics. Interviews explored what women knew about the 2006 abortion law which was then in effect, and the reasons why they preferred informal channels for abortion care over formal healthcare services.
Women's motivations to use misoprostol obtained outside the formal healthcare system were influenced by lack of trust in the healthcare system along with incomplete and inaccurate knowledge of the abortion law. Conversely, women considered misoprostol obtained outside the healthcare system to be effective, affordable, and easier to access.
Obtaining misoprostol outside the formal healthcare system offered a more accessible and appealing prospect for some women given fears of legal repercussion and stigma toward abortion. Though this preference will likely continue despite the more liberal abortion law, strategies should be implemented to broaden knowledge of the recent change in law and to combat misinformation and stigma. This would support knowledge of and access to legal abortion for those who wish to avail themselves of these services.
2006 年,哥伦比亚宪法法院的一项裁决部分将堕胎合法化,允许在强奸、妇女健康或生命有危险以及胎儿畸形无法存活的情况下进行堕胎。尽管有了这项限制较少的法律,但一些妇女和孕妇仍选择在正规医疗体系之外自行进行药物流产,而且往往缺乏准确的信息。2018 年,我们开展了一项研究,以了解促使妇女自行使用非正规途径获取的药物进行流产的原因。此后,哥伦比亚于 2022 年通过了一项进步的法律,允许在怀孕 24 周内要求终止妊娠。然而,该法律的实施仍在进行中。研究 2006 年之后妇女选择自行非正规流产的原因,不仅可以突出当时法律服务障碍持续存在的情况,还可以为增加对当前堕胎法的了解和改善未来服务提供信息。
2018 年,我们对在两家私人诊所接受堕胎后护理的 47 名年龄在 18 岁及以上的妇女进行了深入访谈。这些妇女使用从医疗机构以外获得的米索前列醇自行流产。访谈探讨了妇女对当时有效的 2006 年堕胎法的了解程度,以及她们选择非正式渠道而非正规医疗服务进行堕胎的原因。
妇女选择在正规医疗体系之外使用米索前列醇的动机受到对医疗体系缺乏信任以及对堕胎法了解不完整和不准确的影响。相反,妇女认为在医疗体系之外获得的米索前列醇既有效、负担得起,也更容易获得。
由于对法律后果和堕胎污名的恐惧,一些妇女认为在正规医疗体系之外获得米索前列醇更有吸引力。尽管有了更自由的堕胎法,这种偏好可能会继续存在,但应实施策略来扩大对最近法律变更的了解,并打击错误信息和污名化。这将支持那些希望获得这些服务的人对合法堕胎的了解和获取。