Division of Nephrology, Department of Geriatrics, Jiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, P.R. China.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2024 Feb 12;62(8):1570-1579. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-0080. Print 2024 Jul 26.
The European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) developed two novel equations in 2023 for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR): one sex-free cystatin C-based equation (EKFC) and one creatinine-cystatin C combined equation (EKFC). This study compared their performance with the previous creatinine-based EKFC equation (EKFC) and commonly used Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Berlin Initiative Study (BIS) equations in Chinese adults.
A total of 2,438 Chinese adults (mean age=53.04 years) who underwent the 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging for reference GFR (rGFR) were included. Diagnostic value was evaluated using correlation coefficients, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Performance was assessed in terms of bias, precision (interquartile range of the median difference [IQR]), accuracy (percentage of estimates ±30 % of rGFR [P30], and root-mean-square error [RMSE]) across age, sex, and rGFR subgroups. Gender differences in bias and P30 were also analyzed.
Average rGFR was 73.37 mL/min/1.73 m. EKFC equations showed stronger correlations and larger AUCs compared to the parallel CKD-EPI equations, with EKFC demonstrating the greatest improvement (R=0.771, ROC=0.913). Concerning bias, precision, and accuracy, EKFC equations consistently outperformed CKD-EPI equations. EKFC and EKFC performed acceptably well in the entire population and were equivalent to BIS equations in the elderly. All equations, including EKFC, showed similar P30 accuracy across sexes.
EKFC equations provided a reasonable alternative for estimating GFR in the Chinese adult population. While EKFC did not outperform EKFC, EKFC improved the accuracy of single-marker equations.
欧洲肾脏功能联盟(EKFC)于 2023 年开发了两种新的肾小球滤过率(GFR)估算方程:一种无性别胱抑素 C 基础方程(EKFC)和一种肌酐-胱抑素 C 联合方程(EKFC)。本研究比较了这两种方程在中国成年人中的表现,并与之前基于肌酐的 EKFC 方程(EKFC)以及常用的慢性肾脏病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI)和柏林倡议研究(BIS)方程进行比较。
共纳入 2438 名接受 99mTc-DTPA 肾动态成像以参考肾小球滤过率(rGFR)的中国成年人(平均年龄=53.04 岁)。使用相关系数、敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积评估诊断价值。通过比较不同年龄、性别和 rGFR 亚组的偏差、精密度(中位数差异的四分位距[IQR])、准确性(估计值与 rGFR 的±30%[P30]的百分比和均方根误差[RMSE])评估性能。还分析了性别差异对偏差和 P30 的影响。
平均 rGFR 为 73.37mL/min/1.73m。与平行 CKD-EPI 方程相比,EKFC 方程显示出更强的相关性和更大的 AUC,其中 EKFC 改善最大(R=0.771,ROC=0.913)。在偏差、精密度和准确性方面,EKFC 方程均优于 CKD-EPI 方程。EKFC 方程在整个人群中表现良好,与 BIS 方程在老年人中相当。所有方程,包括 EKFC,在性别间均表现出相似的 P30 准确性。
EKFC 方程为中国成年人群体估计 GFR 提供了一种合理的替代方法。虽然 EKFC 方程没有优于 EKFC 方程,但 EKFC 提高了单标志物方程的准确性。