• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体观察:先平均,后最大。

Seeing in crowds: Averaging first, then max.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, Room 506, Weiqing Building, Beijing, 100084, People's Republic of China.

Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1856-1866. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02468-6. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-024-02468-6
PMID:38337141
Abstract

Crowding, a fundamental limit in object recognition, is believed to result from excessive integration of nearby items in peripheral vision. To understand its pooling mechanisms, we measured subjects' internal response distributions in an orientation crowding task. Contrary to the prediction of an averaging model, we observed a pattern suggesting that the perceptual judgement is made based on choosing the largest response across the noise-perturbed items. A model featuring first-stage averaging and second-stage signed-max operation predicts the diverse errors made by human observers under various signal strength levels. These findings suggest that different rules operate to resolve the bottleneck at early and high-level stages of visual processing, implementing a combination of linear and nonlinear pooling strategies.

摘要

拥挤,是物体识别的一个基本限制,被认为是由于周边视觉中附近物体的过度整合造成的。为了理解其池化机制,我们在方向拥挤任务中测量了被试者的内部反应分布。与平均模型的预测相反,我们观察到一种模式,表明感知判断是基于在受噪声干扰的项目中选择最大反应来做出的。一个具有第一阶段平均和第二阶段符号最大值操作的模型预测了人类观察者在不同信号强度水平下的各种错误。这些发现表明,在视觉处理的早期和高级阶段,不同的规则用于解决瓶颈问题,实现了线性和非线性池化策略的组合。

相似文献

1
Seeing in crowds: Averaging first, then max.群体观察:先平均,后最大。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1856-1866. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02468-6. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
2
Crowding with conjunctions of simple features.简单特征结合时的拥挤现象。
J Vis. 2007 Nov 20;7(2):23.1-12. doi: 10.1167/7.2.23.
3
Non-linear integration of crowded orientation signals.拥挤方向信号的非线性整合
Vision Res. 2008 Oct;48(22):2352-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.022. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
4
The wisdom of crowds for visual search.众包在视觉搜索中的应用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 23;114(21):E4306-E4315. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610732114. Epub 2017 May 10.
5
Crowding--an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a mini-review.拥挤现象——物体识别的关键瓶颈:一篇综述短文
Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(5):635-54. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.009. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
6
Crowding in peripheral vision: why bigger is better.周边视觉拥挤:为何大的更好。
Curr Biol. 2009 Dec 15;19(23):1988-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.056. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
7
Crowding changes appearance.拥挤改变外貌。
Curr Biol. 2010 Mar 23;20(6):496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.023. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
8
Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition.视觉拥挤:意识知觉和物体识别的基本限制。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Apr;15(4):160-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
9
The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images.通过一阶和二阶分类图像揭示的字母拥挤的本质。
J Vis. 2007 Feb 7;7(2):5.1-26. doi: 10.1167/7.2.5.
10
Pooling of continuous features provides a unifying account of crowding.连续特征的汇聚为拥挤现象提供了一个统一的解释。
J Vis. 2016;16(3):39. doi: 10.1167/16.3.39.

本文引用的文献

1
Confidence reflects a noisy decision reliability estimate.置信度反映了一个有噪声的决策可靠性估计。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jan;7(1):142-154. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01464-x. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
2
Subjective confidence reflects representation of Bayesian probability in cortex.主观置信度反映了大脑皮层中贝叶斯概率的表示。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Feb;6(2):294-305. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01247-w. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
3
The Critical Role of V2 Population Receptive Fields in Visual Orientation Crowding.V2 群体感受野在视觉定向拥挤中的关键作用。
Curr Biol. 2019 Jul 8;29(13):2229-2236.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.068. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
4
Cortical Reorganization of Peripheral Vision Induced by Simulated Central Vision Loss.模拟中心视力丧失诱导的周边视野皮层重组。
J Neurosci. 2019 May 1;39(18):3529-3536. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2126-18.2019. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
5
Metacognitive Failure as a Feature of Those Holding Radical Beliefs.元认知失败是持有激进信仰者的特征。
Curr Biol. 2018 Dec 17;28(24):4014-4021.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.053.
6
Contextual-Dependent Attention Effect on Crowded Orientation Signals in Human Visual Cortex.上下文相关注意对人类视觉皮层拥挤方向信号的影响。
J Neurosci. 2018 Sep 26;38(39):8433-8440. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0805-18.2018. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
7
Distinct encoding of decision confidence in human medial prefrontal cortex.人类内侧前额叶皮质中决策置信度的独特编码。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 5;115(23):6082-6087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800795115. Epub 2018 May 21.
8
Multi-level Crowding and the Paradox of Object Recognition in Clutter.多层次拥挤与杂乱中目标识别的悖论。
Curr Biol. 2018 Feb 5;28(3):R127-R133. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.051.
9
Ensemble Perception.整体感知。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:105-129. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044232. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
10
A Unifying Model of Orientation Crowding in Peripheral Vision.周边视觉中方向拥挤的统一模型。
Curr Biol. 2015 Dec 21;25(24):3213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.052. Epub 2015 Nov 25.