Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital of Zamość, 22-400 Zamość, Poland.
Department of Physiology, Pathophysiology and Clinical Immunology Collegium Medicum, The Jan Kochanowski University, 25-369 Kielce, Poland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 28;18(17):9100. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179100.
Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is a relatively safe procedure, but it may cause severe complications such as cardiac/vascular wall tear (CVWT) and tricuspid valve damage (TVD).
The risk factors for CVWT and TVD were examined based on an analysis of data of 1500 extraction procedures performed in two high-volume centers.
The total number of major complications was 33 (2.2%) and included 22 (1.5%) CVWT and 12 (0.8%) TVD (with one case of combined complication). Patients with hemorrhagic complications were younger, more often women, less often presenting low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and those who received their first cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) earlier than the control group. A typical patient with CVWT was a pacemaker carrier, having more leads (including abandoned leads and excessive loops) with long implant duration and a history of multiple CIED-related procedures. The risk factors for TVD were similar to those for CVWT, but the patients were older and received their CIED about nine years earlier. Any form of tissue scar and technical problems were much more common in the two groups of patients with major complications.
The risk factors for CVWT and TVD are similar, and the most important ones are related to long lead dwell time and its consequences for the heart (various forms of fibrotic scarring). The occurrence of procedural complications does not affect long-term survival in patients undergoing lead extraction.
经静脉导线拔除(TLE)是一种相对安全的操作,但可能导致严重并发症,如心血管壁撕裂(CVWT)和三尖瓣损伤(TVD)。
基于两个大容量中心 1500 例拔除手术的数据,分析了 CVWT 和 TVD 的危险因素。
总共有 33 例(2.2%)严重并发症,包括 22 例(1.5%)CVWT 和 12 例(0.8%)TVD(合并 1 例)。发生出血并发症的患者年龄较小,女性较多,左心室射血分数(LVEF)较低的患者较少,且首次接受心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)的时间较对照组早。典型的 CVWT 患者为起搏器携带者,导线较多(包括废弃导线和过多的环),植入时间较长,且有多次与 CIED 相关的手术史。TVD 的危险因素与 CVWT 相似,但患者年龄较大,接受 CIED 治疗的时间早约 9 年。在这两组有严重并发症的患者中,任何形式的组织瘢痕和技术问题都更为常见。
CVWT 和 TVD 的危险因素相似,最重要的是与导线留置时间及其对心脏的影响(各种形式的纤维性瘢痕)有关。在进行导线拔除的患者中,操作并发症的发生并不影响长期生存。